Institutional Repository UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta: No conditions. Results ordered -Date Deposited. 2024-03-29T10:31:17ZEPrintshttp://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/images/sitelogo.pnghttps://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/2014-07-01T06:22:04Z2016-03-14T07:24:11Zhttp://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/13280This item is in the repository with the URL: http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/132802014-07-01T06:22:04ZANALISIS KOMPARATIF FAKTOR EFISIENSI
PADA APLIKASI BLACKBERRY MESSENGER BERBASIS ANDROID
DENGAN WHATSAPP MESSENGER BERBASIS ANDROID
BERDASARKAN TEORI MCCALL’S QUALITY FACTORS
One of communications tool now used by now days people is mobile
messenger application. Opinions compar the advantages and disadvantages to the
two mobile messenger application that became the phenomeon, are Blackberry
Messenger (BBM) and WhatsApp Messenger. The opinion from software testing
after given not using basic theory or method. McCall’s is the oldest testing model,
developed in 1976 . The models are based on undefined requirements to cover
important aspects from a software as a reason from bad software performance.
The object of research used in this study is an application based on
Android and Blackberry Messenger WhatsApp Messenger Android based.
Research depend three aspects according to McCall, the operational
characteristics (Product Operations). Efficiency factor is one of factor used to find
out the level of quality of the software efficiency, with 3 measurements of density
of lines of code (conciseness), the performance (execution efficiency), and ease of
use (operability).
Based on this research, the percentage of the Blackberry Messenger based
on the theory of Quality Factors McCalls are percentage of Operabiltiy is found
69.08%, the percentage of Execution Efficiency is 5.47%, and the percentage of
Conciseness is 7.97%, the results of the analysis of the quality factor of efficiency
is 27.50 %. For WhatsApp Messenger with a percentage of Operability is 73.28%
, the precentage of Efficiency Execution is 2.57%, and the percentage of
Conciseness is 6.34%, the results of the analysis of the quality factor of efficiency
is 27.39%. The comparation from both applications are 27.50% and 27.39%.
Difference from both of them are 0,11%. Lower percentage view better quality.
NIM. 10651022 DAMAR MUSTIKO AJI