<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . . "ANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI\r\nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS)"^^ . "The security of a network is a requirement that is sometimes forgotten. The\r\nsecurity of a network in securing the data stream that is connected between the\r\ncomputer and other computers is indispensable, network systems that do not have\r\na security system could potentially lose a data and a held information. One\r\nsolution to the problems in securing a computer network is to install the Network\r\nIntrusion Detection System (NIDS). This study emphasizes the analysis of the\r\naccuracy and speed of detection on the server Snort and Suricata against activities\r\nattack on the server in the form of Port-Scanning, DDoS and Brute-force, and the\r\nnetwork analysis in the form of delay values.\r\nThis study uses comparative method is experimental. Stages of this research\r\nis divided into several steps that the system design and network, at this stage, the\r\ndesign of the system is used as the system under test. The operating system used\r\nin this study using Ubuntu linux 12:04 which serve as Snort and Suricata servers\r\nand network topology used in this study using by LAN cable as a link between the\r\nattacker and the servers. Implementation of the draft, at this stage, the application\r\nor implementation of designs that have been created to be tested by comparing the\r\nSnort and Suricata. And testing the system using a stress test.\r\nBased on the results of the study, showed Snort has a more efficient\r\nperformance of Suricata, based on the results of testing the network and attack\r\nactivity. On testing the network (delay) the overall average 5:52 ms on Snort and\r\nSuricata result an average value with a value of delay 5.60 ms. On testing portscanning\r\nSnort is superior to the total value of the average accuracy in time is 1\r\nalert/s on Snort and 1.27 alerts/s on Suricata, on DDoS attack Snort is superior\r\nbecause it can detect DDoS attack, and brute-force attack Snort is superior to the\r\ntotal value of the average accuracy in time 0.65 alerts/s and 21.69 alerts/s on\r\nSuricata in response to the attack. Based on test results concluded Snort is more\r\nefficient to be used as Network Intrusion Detection System (NIDS)."^^ . "2015-05-19" . . . . "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . "FAKULTAS SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . . . . . . . "NIM. 10651038"^^ . "MUHAMMAD NAUFAL BAHREISY"^^ . "NIM. 10651038 MUHAMMAD NAUFAL BAHREISY"^^ . . . . . . "ANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI\r\nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS) (Text)"^^ . . . "ANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI\r\nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS) (Text)"^^ . . . "10651038_bab-i_iv-atau-v_daftar-pustaka.pdf"^^ . . . "ANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI\r\nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . . "ANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI\r\nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "ANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI\r\nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "ANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI\r\nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . . "ANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI\r\nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "ANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI\r\nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "ANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI\r\nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "ANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI\r\nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS) (Other)"^^ . . . . . "HTML Summary of #16330 \n\nANALISIS COMPARISON SNORT DAN SURICATA SEBAGAI \nNETWORK INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (NIDS)\n\n" . "text/html" . . . "Tehnik Informatika"@en . .