TY  - THES
N1  - Prof. Dr. H. Muhammad, M.Ag. dan Dr. phil. Sahiron Syamsuddin, M.A.
ID  - digilib19901
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/19901/
A1  - UUN YUSUFA, MA, NIM. 0631510/S3
Y1  - 2016/01/26/
N2  - This dissertation examined the methodological construction of academic thematic
interpretations, including characteristics, affecting factors, comparisons and
implications in the dissertation at UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta and UIN Syarif
Hidayatullah Jakarta. The background was the contemporary scholars? overwhelming
interest in the use of thematic method (mawdu>?i>) due to the need for more practical
interpretation methods to solve problems and capture the theme of unity in the Qur?an.
This phenomenon was also seen in the study of the Qur?an in PTAIN, particularly in
the form of a dissertation.
This research was the study of literature in the realm of philosophy
(epistemology) with the perspective of the theory of ?power? of Michel Foucault which
puts thematic interpretation in the framework as a discourse (relations and social
practices) in a particular society. The primary data source in this study was the
dissertation concerning thematic interpretation at UIN Yogyakarta and UIN Jakarta
between the years 1989-2011 with a sample of each of the four dissertations. Data
collected were analyzed using discourse analysis.
This study showed that academic thematic interpretation was collaboration
between the thematic methods in the study of the Qur?an and qualitative research
methodologies. Paradigmatic framework of the Qur?an as a guide, the unity of content
and themes of the Qur?an, the textual/literary Qur?an, the historicity of the Qur?an, and
the Qur?an as the subject of qualitative research were not opposed to each other, but
collaborated to achieve the mission of capturing the integrity of the message of the
Qur?an. New theories were used to supplement the paradigmatic framework to get the
comprehensive and integrative-interconnected interpretation. This interpretation was
prepared by a variety of methods or approaches that fit in understanding passages in a
particular theme, such as semantics, semiotics, hermeneutics, content analysis, and so
on. Al-Farmawi?s formulation was not dominant in academic thematic interpretation
since shifted by the collaboration between a variety of methods or approaches in the
qualitative realm. Hasan Hanafi?s formulation had not been elaborated in this academic
thematic interpretation, either. However, the influence of rationalism and
modernization of Islamic thoughts looks evenly on the majority of the dissertation on
thematic interpretation. Trends in thematic interpretation were the influence of the
growing discourse, ie, the Farmawian?s thematic interpretation method, scientificallyrationally
qualitative research methodology, and the contemporary hermeneutics of the
Qur?an. Thematic interpretation dissertations at UIN Yogyakarta tended not to use the
formulation of al-Farmawi, while the dissertations at UIN Jakarta tended to adapt or
appreciate by mentioning it in the formulation of research methods, or only in the
bibliography. The implication was that the interpreter had different method
formulations, including the use of paradigmatic framework and various scientific
approaches accordingly. The interpreter had to be creative in formulating methods of
research and its application in achieving integrative-interconnected mission of science
and addressing human contemporary issues.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
M1  - doctoral
TI  - TAFSIR ALQURAN AKADEMIK DI INDONESIA:
KAJIAN METODE TEMATIK DISERTASI
DI UIN YOGYAKARTA DAN UIN JAKARTA
AV  - restricted
ER  -