@phdthesis{digilib21299,
           month = {June},
           title = {PENGEMBANGAN SISTEM INFORMASI PEMETAAN
DAERAH RAWAN TANAH LONGSOR MENGGUNAKAN
METODE EXTREME PROGRAMMING},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM. 11651032 BAYU TEGUH PAMUJI},
            year = {2016},
            note = {Agus Mulyanto, S.Si, M.Kom},
        keywords = {Landslide, Extreme Programming, Pmapper Framework, Mapserver,
Refactoring, Geographic Information Systems},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/21299/},
        abstract = {Bantul District has considerable points of landslide potential, it is because
the district located at a mountain to hill morphology. Badan Penanggulangan
Bencana Daerah Kabupaten Bantul, the local department for natural disaster, has
studied landslide events and done disaster counceling in some villages, yet this
method needs much time and less effective if there are several changes in the data.
The Extreme Programming method is a software development approach
which adopt agile approach that assumed to be able to help to raise the efficiency
and flexibility of software development project by combining some simple ideas.
The system to be developed was built using the pmapper framework, mapserver
and php programming language. This system which able to show a digital map
that able to categorize landslide potential area with a different color in each
category based on its total scoring factors.
The process of modifying data landslides factor in this system using
refactoring process. In this study, based on the results of functional testing system,
all respondents agreed that system admin and user systems working properly.
Based on the results of testing the system interface for admin system, shows that
43.75\% of respondents strongly agreed, 46.25\% of respondents agreed, 10\% of
respondents neutral, 0\% of respondents disagreed and 0\% of respondents strongly
disagree. While the results of testing the system interface for user system, showed
that 32.5\% of respondents strongly agreed, 57.5\% of respondents agreed, 10\% of
respondents neutral, 0\% of respondents disagreed and 0\% of respondents strongly
disagree.}
}