%0 Thesis
%9 Doctoral
%A FAHMI RIADY, NIM.  1130010004
%B PROGRAM PASCA SARJANA
%D 2016
%F digilib:22303
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K A‘ẓamī, Schacht, Isnād, and Ḥadīth.
%P 475
%T ASAL-USUL HADIS  (TELAAH KEAKURATAN KRITIK M. MUṢṬAFĀ A‘ẒAMĪ ATAS TEORI  ISNĀD JOSEPH SCHACHT
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/22303/
%X This dissertation is entitled: The Origin of Ḥadīth: Assessing  the Accuracy of the Criticism of M. Muṣṭāfā A‘ẓamī on the Isnād  Theory by Joseph Schacht. This study was motivated by the  Orientalist doubts about the origin of hadith sourcing from the  Prophet. Schacht proved, with a careful historical analysis, which  Isnād appeared around the beginning of the 2nd century of Hijrī  year, which indicated that the hadith was only projected to the past  which was fictitious put into the mouth of the Prophet.  Schacht findings in the book The Origins of Muhammadan  Jurisprudence got loud refutation from A‘ẓamī. In On Schacht's  Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence, A‘ẓamī criticized all  theories of Schacht. Muslim scholars claimed that A‘ẓamī’s  criticism over the isnād theory by Schacht was accurate and  managed to break down all arguments conveyed by Schacht. The  claim was the matter that the author wanted to prove its truth.  With reference to A‘ẓamī’s criticism on Schacht’s isnād  theory, formulation of the problem was made to figure out the  ḥadīth epistemology by M. Muṣṭāfā A‘ẓamī, A‘ẓamī’s criticism on  Schacht’s isnād theory, and the extent of the accuracy of A‘ẓamī’s  criticism on Schacht’s isnād theory.  To answer the formulation of the above problems, the  authors used three theories: the theory of knowledge  (epistemology), the theory of hermeneutics, and the theory of truth.  The method used was descriptive-analytic-critical. The data on the  thinking of the ḥadīth according to A‘ẓamī and his criticism on  Schacht’s isnād theory were inventoried, analyzed, reduced,  classified, displayed, and interpreted. After that, all was described  in accordance with the formulation of the problem. Because the  study relied on the accuracy of the evidence on A‘ẓamī’s criticism  over Schacht’s isnād theory, in this section the author carefully  analyzed how A‘ẓamī understood the issues raised by Schacht,  analyzed how A‘ẓamī used of sources, proposition, understanding  of the proposition, and analyzed the conclusions drawn.  From the results of the study, the author found that A‘ẓamī’s  criticism on Schacht’s isnād theory was inaccurate. The  fundamental problem was that A‘ẓamī’s criticism was not based on  Schacht’s correct arguments. A‘ẓamī only relied on case example,  xv  obsessed with Muslim scholar critical method, and performed  verification with reference to the classical hadith collections.  The results of these findings led the author to design a  criticism project on Schacht. Learning from A‘ẓamī’s failure,  before criticizing the case examples given by Schacht, the author  recommends that the criticism should be directed at Schacht's  thesis about the narrators from different schools of thought, the  criticism on Schacht’s thesis about the relation among mazhab  figures (schools), and the criticism on the origin of the problem. By  performing these steps, the criticism will then be qualified and  accurate.
%Z Prof. Dr. H. Syamsul Anwar, M.A.