TY  - THES
N1  - Prof. Dr. H. Syamsul Anwar, M.A.
ID  - digilib22303
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/22303/
A1  - FAHMI RIADY, NIM.  1130010004
Y1  - 2016/06/16/
N2  - This dissertation is entitled: The Origin of ?ad?th: Assessing
the Accuracy of the Criticism of M. Mu???f? A??am? on the Isn?d
Theory by Joseph Schacht. This study was motivated by the
Orientalist doubts about the origin of hadith sourcing from the
Prophet. Schacht proved, with a careful historical analysis, which
Isn?d appeared around the beginning of the 2nd century of Hijr?
year, which indicated that the hadith was only projected to the past
which was fictitious put into the mouth of the Prophet.
Schacht findings in the book The Origins of Muhammadan
Jurisprudence got loud refutation from A??am?. In On Schacht's
Origins of Muhammadan Jurisprudence, A??am? criticized all
theories of Schacht. Muslim scholars claimed that A??am??s
criticism over the isn?d theory by Schacht was accurate and
managed to break down all arguments conveyed by Schacht. The
claim was the matter that the author wanted to prove its truth.
With reference to A??am??s criticism on Schacht?s isn?d
theory, formulation of the problem was made to figure out the
?ad?th epistemology by M. Mu???f? A??am?, A??am??s criticism on
Schacht?s isn?d theory, and the extent of the accuracy of A??am??s
criticism on Schacht?s isn?d theory.
To answer the formulation of the above problems, the
authors used three theories: the theory of knowledge
(epistemology), the theory of hermeneutics, and the theory of truth.
The method used was descriptive-analytic-critical. The data on the
thinking of the ?ad?th according to A??am? and his criticism on
Schacht?s isn?d theory were inventoried, analyzed, reduced,
classified, displayed, and interpreted. After that, all was described
in accordance with the formulation of the problem. Because the
study relied on the accuracy of the evidence on A??am??s criticism
over Schacht?s isn?d theory, in this section the author carefully
analyzed how A??am? understood the issues raised by Schacht,
analyzed how A??am? used of sources, proposition, understanding
of the proposition, and analyzed the conclusions drawn.
From the results of the study, the author found that A??am??s
criticism on Schacht?s isn?d theory was inaccurate. The
fundamental problem was that A??am??s criticism was not based on
Schacht?s correct arguments. A??am? only relied on case example,
xv
obsessed with Muslim scholar critical method, and performed
verification with reference to the classical hadith collections.
The results of these findings led the author to design a
criticism project on Schacht. Learning from A??am??s failure,
before criticizing the case examples given by Schacht, the author
recommends that the criticism should be directed at Schacht's
thesis about the narrators from different schools of thought, the
criticism on Schacht?s thesis about the relation among mazhab
figures (schools), and the criticism on the origin of the problem. By
performing these steps, the criticism will then be qualified and
accurate.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - A??am?
KW  -  Schacht
KW  -  Isn?d
KW  -  and ?ad?th.
M1  - doctoral
TI  - ASAL-USUL HADIS
(TELAAH KEAKURATAN KRITIK M. MU??AF? A??AM? ATAS TEORI
ISN?D JOSEPH SCHACHT
AV  - restricted
EP  - 475
ER  -