@phdthesis{digilib33865,
           month = {January},
           title = {COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRANSLATION ON HARF JAR AL-B{\=A}?
IN S{\=U}RAH AL-KAHF BY ABDULLAH YUSUF ALI AND MUHAMMAD
MARMADUKE PICKTHALL},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM. 11150025 MUHAMMAD WAHYU AL AZIZ},
            year = {2019},
            note = {Dr. Kardimin, M.Hum},
        keywords = {translation, harf jar al-ba?, equivalence},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/33865/},
        abstract = {This research discusses the English translation of harf jar al-b{\=a}? in s{\=u}rah al-kahf
by Abdullah Yusuf Ali and Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall. This research will
analyse the different of harf jar al-ba? which is translated into English through the
comparative study approach. This research has two research questions: firstly,
how far the different of harf jar al-b{\=a}? in s{\=u}rah al-kahf translated inito English by
AbdullahYusuf Ali and Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall to the translation
quality, and the second is what equivalence which is used on translation of harf
jar al-b{\=a}? in s{\=u}rah al-kahf by Abdullah Yusuf Ali and Muhammad Marmaduke
Pickthall.
This research uses qualitative research. It applies the theory of harf jar ba? by Al-
Ghalayainy to identify the meaning of harf jar ba? in s{\=u}rah al-kahf. Furthermore,
this research uses the theory of word classes by Quirk to explain harf jar ba? in
English translation. In addition, the writer uses equivalence theory by Nida and
Taber to identify equivalence which is used by both translators in translating harf
jar ba? into English.
The writer concludes that harf jar ba? in s{\=u}rah al-kahf translated in various ways
based on the dictions that is used and the background of both translators. Both
translators translated harf jar ba? into preposition, adverb, conjunction and
untranslated (zero) in different number of cases. Abdullah Yusuf Ali adopted
formal correspondence in 21 cases and dynamic equivalence in 19 cases.
Meanwhile, Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall adopted formal correspondence in
24 cases and dynamic equivalence in 16 cases.}
}