@phdthesis{digilib34310,
           month = {July},
           title = {PRAKTIK ?JUAL-BELI? JASA SEMINAR BISNIS DI YOGYAKARTA
(TINJAUAN YURIDIS DAN HUKUM ISLAM)},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM.  14380029 MIA NUR FADILAH},
            year = {2018},
            note = {Abdul Mughits, S.Ag., M.Ag.},
        keywords = {Seminar Bisnis, Perlindungan Konsumen, Normatif, Yuridis},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/34310/},
        abstract = {Observing the development of technology and economy growth in
Indonesia especially in Yogyakarta recently, causes a new innovation such as
buying and selling business seminars. Actually the entity of the seminar is a social
activity not the entity of business activity. However, in reality the business
seminar activities are growing and used as a tool to gain benefits for certain
parties. Because it only focuses on profit as much as possible, thus making
business actors do not run the sale under the provisions in force. This has an
impact on the non-fulfillment of consumer rights. Based on these problems, the
researcher is interested to examine how the validity analysis of contracts and
consumer protection against the practice of 'buying and selling' business seminar
services in Yogyakarta both in terms of normative and juridical.
This research is field research that aims to collect data related to the
implementation of 'sale-buy' business seminar services. Then analyze the validity
of the contract or agreement with the covenant theory in Islamic law (ijarah ala?
mal) and positive law, and analyze the implementation of consumer protection
with consumer protection theory in Islamic law and positive law. So that this
research is descriptive-analytic, that is giving description of facts in field about
transaction and also process of implementation of 'buying and selling' services of
business seminar and implementation of consumer protection in practice of
'buying and selling' business seminar in Yogyakarta obtained from interview
result, or the result of document analysis through appropriate interpretation to
then make a conclusion.
Based on the result of the research, it can be concluded that 'buying and
selling' business seminar is not legitimately juridical because there are elements
of fraud and wanprestasi done by one of the parties (article 1321 KUH Perdata).
Then, the normative 'buying and selling' business seminar services are also not
valid because there are legitimate requirements of unlawful contracts, namely the
legal requirement on the object of the contract where not the implementation of
the contract object based on the initial advertising offered and the purpose of the
contract in which the achievement of the purpose of the contract is indicated by
implementation of a contract based on agreement. Then the implementation of
consumer rights protection in the 'sale and purchase' of business seminar services
from both a normative and juridical point of view can not be fulfilled. So as to
result in the rights of consumers who are injured by business actors and
consumers feel aggrieved, and there is no effort of good faith from business actors
to replace consumer losses.}
}