@mastersthesis{digilib34608, month = {January}, title = {THE LEGAL FATWA OF THE INDONESIAN COUNCIL OF ULAMA (MUI) ON FAJAR NUSANTARA MOVEMENT (GAFATAR)}, school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA}, author = {NIM: 11360075 M. HUDAN DARDIRI}, year = {2019}, note = {MUHRISUN, M.Ag., M.S.W., Ph.D.}, keywords = {Fatwa, heretical, Gafatar, Farid Esack, Jacques Derrida}, url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/34608/}, abstract = {The Indonesian council of ulama (MUI) is an independent nongovernment organization consist of Muslim leaders, scholars, and zuama to provide verdics and other related religious references in Indonesia, especially as they relate to aqidah, fiqh, and dan other relegious matters. MUI was formed in 1975 from the idea of the ulama and zuama to build the Indonesian spirituality during the phase of revival. Specifically, MUI was formed to oversee the religious condition in Indonesia including giving fatwa to the people and government and guarding against the compound relegiousity in Indonesia. One of the most controversial fatwa issued by MUI is the one issues in 2016 on the heretical sect is Gerakan Fajar Nusantara (Gafatar) as it was declared in fatwa MUI number 06/2016. This research focuses on controversies emerged as a result of the the MUI Fatwa on Gafatar. The data was collected through series of literature review, while the data was analysed using a format of descriptive analysis. Maqasid asysyariah is utilised in this study, especially as an effort to better explore the nature of the MUI fatwa. It is the aim of this study to examine the MUI fatwa on heresy in the perspectives of Farid Esack?s hermeneutic liberation and Derrida?s concept of deconstruction. The comparative between liberation hermeneutic and deconstruction on dissecting Gafatar heretical fatwa which is issued by the Indonesian Council of Ulama (MUI) are purposed to see clearly how different views can just happen among the society with its own truth they offer. As one of the citizen of the big heterogeneous nation (Indonesia), it is important to understand well those differences among us in order to have the wise respond toward those differencences.} }