eprintid: 42426
rev_number: 16
eprint_status: archive
userid: 12460
dir: disk0/00/04/24/26
datestamp: 2021-06-10 04:56:46
lastmod: 2021-06-10 04:56:46
status_changed: 2021-06-10 04:56:46
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: Abdul Khalik., S. Sos., NIM.: 18203010014
title: NILAI KEMASLAHATAN KEWENANGAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DI INDONESIA
ispublished: pub
subjects: huk_tata
divisions: ilmu_sya
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Kemaslahatan, Kewenangan, Komisi Yudisial
note: Prof.  Dr. H. Kamsi, M.A.
abstract: Judicial commissions in various countries have long been developed within the judiciary as state  institutions formed to ensure the independence of the judiciary. In various countries, the  establishment of the Judicial Commission is part of the legal reform agenda with the aim of  strengthening the independence and accountability of the judiciary and even the existence of the  Judicial Commission in various countries is very urgent especially as the country is undergoing a  democratic or democratic transition. In Indonesia the Judicial Commission is arguably quite slow in  its presence when compared to other countries. The main issues discussed in  this study are as  follows: First "What is the Urgency of the Judicial Commission's Authority in the Legislative  Perspective?" Second, "Why is there an authority rivalry between the Judicial Commission and the  Supreme Court?"
This type of research used in the preparation of this thesis is library research. The nature of the  research used in this research is analytical descriptive. The approach used in this research is a  normative juridical approach with the theory of Maṣhlaḥaẖ, Authority and Supervision. The data  sources in this study are divided into two, namely primary and secondary.
The  results  of  this  thesis research  indicate  that  the formation  of  the Judicial Commission actually brings the general benefit of a Dharuriy nature, a basic necessity in  the life of the nation and the state, brings benefits to the majority of mankind, given that  Collusion, Curruption and Nepotism (KKN) are rampant in Indonesia. Especially for the Judiciary as  God's representative, in this case the judge who upholds justice needs to be guarded and supervised  by an independent institution, namely KY so that there is no KKN in the judiciary because Islam  requires prohibiting theft, prohibiting fraud, and treason. The presence of KY is actually intended  so that the Supreme Court justices and judges in carrying out their authority and duties are truly  based on the prevailing laws and regulations, the truth and sense of justice in the community will  be realized,  so that the code of ethics and the profession of judges will be upheld. If supreme  judges and judges carry out their duties and powers properly and correctly, of course the judges  concerned have upheld the constitution, honor, dignity and behavior of judges.
date: 2020-08-04
date_type: published
pages: 139
institution: UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
department: FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
thesis_type: masters
thesis_name: other
citation:   Abdul Khalik., S. Sos., NIM.: 18203010014  (2020) NILAI KEMASLAHATAN KEWENANGAN KOMISI YUDISIAL DI INDONESIA.  Masters thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/42426/1/18203010014_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/42426/2/18203010014_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf