%0 Thesis
%9 Skripsi
%A NOVA RAMDANI, NIM.: 16340016
%B FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM
%D 2021
%F digilib:43177
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Responsibility, Crime, Abortion
%P 103
%T PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA TENAGA NON MEDIS PELAKU  TINDAK PIDANA ABORSI BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG   NOMOR 36 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG KESEHATAN  (Analisis Putusan Nomor 212/Pid.Sus/2011/PN.Pso)
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/43177/
%X Abortion is an abortion or in other words, the removal of the product of   conception before the fetus is not able to live outside the womb by terminating the  life of the fetus before being given a chance to live. Based on Decision Number:  212/Pid.Sus/PN.Pso. Whereas Rahima S Borahima (the defendant) who is a Civil  Servant is found guilty of committing the crime of abortion as referred to in  Article 194 jo. Article 75 paragraph (2) of  Law Number 36 Year 2009 about  Health. The judge handed down a verdict with 10 month imprisonment and a fine  of Rp. 10.000.000.00 (ten million rupiahs), which should be a maximum of 10  years in prison and a fine of Rp. 1.000.000.000 ( one billion rupiah ).   This type and research is library research (library research) with a  normative juridical approach. The method of  legal analysis is descriptive  analytical by providing a systematic and logical explanation and then analyzing it.  Meanwhile, the method of colleting legal materials is by examining legal sources,   in the form of primary and secondary data sources.   The results of this study are that the criminal responsibility of non-medical  personnel who perpetrates the crime of abortion as regulated in law Number 36 of  2009 concerning Health, remains based on the existence of criminal acts and the  existence of mistakes. However, it does not contain anything specially regarding  the subject of criminal conviction abortion perpetrator.
%Z Pembimbing UDIYO BASUKI., S.H., M.Hum