@mastersthesis{digilib44055,
           month = {June},
           title = {TAFSIR AYAT-AYAT MANAZIL AL-AKHLAK ABDURRA?UF AL-SINKILI DALAM KITAB TANBIH AL-MASYI DAN TARJUM{\=A}N AL-MUSTAF{\=I}D},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM: 19200010020 Ahmad Husein, S.I.Q., S. Ag},
            year = {2021},
            note = {Dr. Moch. Nur Ichwan, S. Ag., M.A.},
        keywords = {Abdurra'{\=u}f al-Sinkil{\=i}, Tanbih Al-Masyi, Tarjuman al-Mustafd and which verses manazil al-akhlak},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/44055/},
        abstract = {This research describes the sufistic concept which{\ensuremath{>}} mana{\ensuremath{>}}zil al-akhla{\ensuremath{>}}k 'Abdurra'{\=u}f al-Sinkil{\=i} in his book Tanbi{\ensuremath{>}}h al-Ma{\ensuremath{>}}syi{\ensuremath{>}}, a book of Sufism and Tarjum{\=a}n Al-Mustaf{\=i}d, an interpretation of the Koran. This thesis uses library research with Jorge's hermeneutic approach. J.E. Gracia and historical. The object of this research is the concept of which man{\ensuremath{>}}azil al-akhla{\ensuremath{>}}k in two works of Abdurra{\ensuremath{>}} 'uf al-Sinki{\ensuremath{>}} li, namely: in Tanbi{\ensuremath{>}}h Al-Ma{\ensuremath{>}}syi and Tarjuma{\ensuremath{>}}n Al-Mustafi{\ensuremath{>}}d, the two works become the primary source of this research. Meanwhile, the secondary sources are historical books, Sufism, commentary and research on Abdurra{\ensuremath{>}} 'uf al-Sinki{\ensuremath{>}}li.
This thesis answers three problems, namely, what are the characteristics of Abdurra{\ensuremath{>}} 'uf al-Sinki{\ensuremath{>}} li in Tanbi{\ensuremath{>}}h Al-Ma{\ensuremath{>}}syi and Tarjuma{\ensuremath{>}}n Al-Mustafi{\ensuremath{>}}d? How are the similarities and differences in the interpretation of which mana{\ensuremath{>}}zil al-akhlak 'in the two books? Why are there similarities and differences in interpreting which verses mana{\ensuremath{>}}zil al-akhla{\ensuremath{>}}k in the two books?
This study found, firstly that the character of Abdurra{\ensuremath{>}} u'f al-Sinki{\ensuremath{>}} li thought in the Tanbi{\ensuremath{>}}h Al-Ma{\ensuremath{>}}syi{\ensuremath{>}} character was mystical-philosophical in nature, while Tarjuma{\ensuremath{>}}n Al-Mustafi{\ensuremath{>}}d was in the form of sharia. formalists. Second, al-Sinkili interprets which verses mana{\ensuremath{>}}zil al-akhla{\ensuremath{>}}k in Tarjuma{\ensuremath{>}}n al-Mustafi{\ensuremath{>}}d by emphasizing more on the textual (exoteric meaning) or literal meaning, whereas in Tanbi{\ensuremath{>}}h Al-Ma{\ensuremath{>}}syi {\ensuremath{>}}, he emphasized the inner meaning (esoteric meanig) by looking for the implied meaning in the text of the Koran. Al-Sinki{\ensuremath{>}} li also emphasized wasatiyyah (moderation) in interpreting religion so that it was accepted by opposing circles between Nuruddin al-Rani{\ensuremath{>}}ri and Hamzah al-Fansu{\ensuremath{>}}ri. Third, the difference in the interpretation of which mana{\ensuremath{>}}zil al-akhla{\ensuremath{>}}k occurs because al-Sinki{\ensuremath{>}}li considers the target audience (audience) of the two books, Tanbi{\ensuremath{>}}h Al-Ma{\ensuremath{>}}syi{\ensuremath{>}} was written for Sufism while Tarjuma{\ensuremath{>}}n al-Mustafi{\ensuremath{>}}d for the Islamic community and the general public.}
}