@phdthesis{digilib46210, month = {July}, title = {POLITIK HUKUM OMNIBUS LAW DALAM KEWENANGAN PERIZINAN LINGKUNGAN PERSPEKTIF OTONOMI DAERAH}, school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA}, author = {NIM. 14340112 ADI GUNAWAN}, year = {2021}, note = {DR. HJ. SITI FATIMAH, S.H., M.HUM.}, keywords = {Omnibus Law, Regional Autonomy, Licensing Authority}, url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/46210/}, abstract = {The content material in the Omnibus Law of the Job Creation Law, especially in the field of Regional Government, has the potential to lead to the practice of recentralization of power which is also found in the Regional Government Law. This pattern was formed with the issuance of laws that have regulations such as withdrawal of affairs from regional governments and instruments for approval or evaluation by the central government that are increasingly stringent. The existence of the potential that leads to the dominance of the Central Government or the authority of the Regional Government, has shifted the principle of decentralization as guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution. Therefore, the researcher wants to examine this matter more deeply with the research title: Law Politics of Omnibus Law in Environmental Licensing Authorities from the Perspective of Regional Autonomy. This research aims to know for sure how the law politics of the Omnibus Law of the Job Creation Law is, especially in terms of the authority of the Regional Government in environmental licensing and what the implications are for regional autonomy. This research is descriptive-analytical library research, using a normative juridical approach. This research uses to answer the questions of (1) how the law politics of omnibus law is in the authority of environmental licensing in the regions. (2) what are the implications for regional autonomy. Based on the research conducted, the researcher found that the changes in articles concerning the authority of local governments in the Omnibus Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation, especially the Regional Government section, gave birth to symptoms of the strengthening of the Central Government which led to centralism and this, of course, violated the principle of decentralization guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution} }