@phdthesis{digilib46280,
           month = {July},
           title = {ANALISIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN HAKIM DALAM KASUS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA
(Studi Putusan Nomor: 517/Pid.B/2013/Pn.Smn)},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM. 17103040052 NURUL ULFA},
            year = {2021},
            note = {Prof. Dr. Drs. H. MAKHRUS, S.H., M.Hum.},
        keywords = {Murder, Premeditated Murder, Ordinary Crime},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/46280/},
        abstract = {Indonesia, the law-based country, on every human or community activity which is an activity of life must be based on the existing regulations and norms in society, but not all elements in society are ready and prepared to submit to these existing rules. Therefore, unlawful acts such as the crime of premeditated murder arise. The verdict case acts of criminal premeditated murder with No. 517/Pid.B/2013/PN.Smn states that the defendant was proved to be validated and convinced guilty of committing acts of the criminal premeditated murder, therefore the defendant imposed the penalty in prison for 10 (ten) years. The premeditated murder crime which is regulated in Article 340 of the Criminal Code is the most heinous act, and this is inhumane and violates human rights because the murder perpetrator has robbed the right of life of the person who was killed. Premeditated murder crime considered a serious crime because the crime has taken the lives of others.
The current research includes normative legal research. This type of research emphasizes searching for the truth and accurate facts about an event that becomes the research object. The researcher uses descriptive-analytical research which explains how the judge's considerations in making decisions and juridical reviews on fracture No.517/Pid.B/2013/Pn.Smn were following Article 340 of the Criminal Code. Because of the current research included in the normative juridical study, the researcher examines and analyzes the judge's decision in the premeditated murder crime.
Based on the conducted research, the researcher concludes that the legal basis of the judge on the Decision Number: 517/Pid.B/2013/Pn.Smn was in accordance with Article 340 which the elements have fulfilled. The judge's considerations in deciding the verdict are the prosecutor's indictment, the witness statement, the defendant statement and the commuting and aggravating matters following the provisions of Article 197 paragraph (1) letter F Criminal Procedure Code. By the decision aspects, both the material and formal aspects have been fulfilled.}
}