eprintid: 46322
rev_number: 10
eprint_status: archive
userid: 12259
dir: disk0/00/04/63/22
datestamp: 2021-11-04 02:17:55
lastmod: 2021-11-04 02:17:55
status_changed: 2021-11-04 02:17:55
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
creators_name: MUHAMMAD IHZA SATRIANSYAH, NIM. 17103040117
title: PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA
KONSUMEN OLEH PENGADILAN NEGERI DI TINJAU DARI
YURISPRUDENSI NOMOR 1/YUR/PERKONS/2018
(Studi Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2019/PN.Tsm)
ispublished: pub
subjects: il_huk
divisions: il_hum
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Authority, BPSK, Consumer Dispute, Financing Agreement
note: ISWANTORO, S.H., M.H.
abstract: The Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK) is the agency authorized
to handle and resolve consumer disputes by means of mediation or arbitration or
conciliation. However, in practice, many parties object to the decision issued by
BPSK and submit its cancellation to the court, one of the reasons for objections that
are often found is the authority of BPSK in resolving consumer disputes. Even
recently, there are still many objections to the court regarding this matter, including
the case to be analyzed, namely the case of the Tasikmalaya District Court Number
41/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2019/PN.Tsm. The problems that will be discussed are the
reasons for business actors to file an objection to the BPSK decision number
025/A/BPSK-KOTA.TSM/X/2019 to the Tasikmalaya District Court and the
consideration of the Tasikmalaya District Court judge in case number 41/Pdt.Sus-
BPSK/2019 /PN.Tsm is reviewed based on Jurisprudence number
1/Yur/Perkons/2018.
The method used in this research is using juridical research approach
normative with the type of research that will be used is library research. The data
that has been collected will be analyzed qualitatively by describing the content and
structure of positive law with the aim of determining the meaning of legal
regulations related to research. The theoretical framework that will be discussed is
the theory of legal certainty, agreement theory, consumer protection theory, and
dispute resolution theory.
The results of the study on the decision of the Tasikmalaya District Court
Number 41/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2019/PN.Tsm. shows that BPSK is not authorized to
adjudicate disputes arising from the financing and credit agreements in question.
This is also in line with the Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of the Republic of
Indonesia number 1/Yur/Perkons/2018, which states that disputes arising from
consumer financing agreements are not consumer disputes so that the dispute is not
under the authority of BPSK.
date: 2021-08-18
date_type: published
pages: 184
institution: UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
department: FAKULTAS SYARI'AH DAN HUKUM
thesis_type: skripsi
thesis_name: other
citation:   MUHAMMAD IHZA SATRIANSYAH, NIM. 17103040117  (2021) PEMBATALAN PUTUSAN BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN OLEH PENGADILAN NEGERI DI TINJAU DARI YURISPRUDENSI NOMOR 1/YUR/PERKONS/2018 (Studi Putusan Nomor 41/Pdt.Sus-BPSK/2019/PN.Tsm).  Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/46322/1/17103040117_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/46322/2/17103040117_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf