%0 Thesis
%9 Skripsi
%A Siti Amanah, NIM.: 17103040024
%B FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
%D 2021
%F digilib:47196
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Sertifikat Tanah, Sengketa Pertanahan, Yuridis
%P 128
%T ANALISIS YURIDIS KEKUATAN SERTIFIKAT TANAH SEBAGAI ALAT PEMBUKTIAN DIPERSIDANGAN DITINJAU DARI PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 24 TAHUN 1997 TENTANG PENDAFTARAN TANAH (STUDI PUTUSAN NO: 3/PDT.G/2015/PN.BTL DAN PUTUSAN NO: 12/PDT.G/2018/PN.BTL)
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/47196/
%X Ownership of land rights can be owned by individuals or legal entities  provided that the publicity system is used in the implementation of land registration. The reality of law enforcement is that it is often found that land title certificates that have been issued for more than 5 (five) years can be brought to court to be canceled. This research was conducted to determine and explain the strength of land certificates as a means of proof in court in terms of Article 32 of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997. In addition, to find out judges' considerations in deciding land disputes based on evidence of land title certificates. Some of the theories that are used as a guide for this research include the theory of evidence in Civil Procedure Law, and land registration theory, the theory of the legal system of Lawrence Friedman.   This research is descriptive-analysis in nature, by examining judgments in a juridical (normative) juridical manner, namely looking at practices in decisions through a legal norm approach. The decisions studied were Decisions No: 3 / Pdt.G / 2015 / Pn.Btl and Decisions No: 12 / Pdt.G / 2018 / Pn.Btl. To examine the strength of land certificates as evidence in court with the primary legal material which is used as the basis, namely Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration.   The results of this study conclude that the strength of the certificate as a means of proof in court in terms of Government Regulation Number 24 of 1997 in the Study of Decision No: 3 / Pdt.G / 2015 / Pn.Btl and Decision No: 12 / Pdt.G / 2018 / Pn.Btl It is strong, this is in line with the publication system in Indonesia which uses a negative publication system that has a positive tendency, because it can still be canceled if it can be proven otherwise through a court. To prove ownership rights over a land parcel, it can be proven by means of evidence as specified in the HIR / RBg and the Civil Code. Judges' considerations in deciding land disputes based on evidence of land title certificates in the study of Decision No: 3 / Pdt.G / 2015 / Pn.Btl and Decision No: 12 / Pdt.G / 2018 / Pn.Btl which essentially question legality sale and purchase deed drawn up before PPAT, because it has an impact on the validity of the land certificate. The two decisions were that the judge did not use Article 32 Paragraph (2) PP No. 24/1997 as a basis for deciding cases, even though the submitted certificate was more than 5 years old, in seeking formal and material truth the judge preferred to carry out an examination of the case written evidence and witness statements.
%Z Pembimbing : Iswantoro, S.H., M.Hum.