%A NIM.: 18205010035 Abdul Fatah, S.Ud
%O Pembimbing : Dr. Inayah Rohmaniyah, S.Ag., M.Hum., M.A.
%T DOMINASI DAN MARGINALISASI PEMIKIRAN TAKFIRI DALAM STUDI AL-QUR’AN (STUDI PENAFSIRAN SAYYID QUTB DALAM KITAB TAFSIR FI ZILAL AL-QUR’AN)
%X Takfiri thought that has developed so far is generally a product of textual
interpretation. This is different from Sayyid Quṭb, who has marginalized the bi alriwāyah
interpretation method. The discourse of takfiri thought in the realm of
Islamic theology is the result of textual interpretation of religious texts that
contain takfiri ideology. Textual interpretation refers to tradition, based on the
Qur‟an and hadith, the opinions of creed and fiqh scholars, and the opinions of
early Muslim commentators. The interpreters in general tend to give textual
meaning. So, that gives to a stagnant meaning of takfiri, and ignores the
possibility of the flexibility of other meanings. It is different from Sayyid Quṭb
who has a different approach in his interpretation which gives a firm
interpretation. This study aims to see the dominance and marginalization of the
discourse behind Sayyid Quṭb‟s takfiri thought in his commentary.
This research is the result of a qualitative library research. The primary
data source is the interpretation of verses containing the meaning of takfiri in
Tafsīr fī Ẓilāl al-Qur‟ān book. While the secondary data sources include data in
the form of literature in the form of books, books, journals, website pages, and
other studies. The collected data is then sorted, reduced, and classified according
to research needs. The data analysis is done by the exclusion theory and
genealogy which formulatef by Michel Foucault. The exclusion theory will be
divided into two stages, external and internal to seek the power and control of
discourse in interpretation. While in genealogy, the way is using the method of
marginalization and normalization. This stage aims to look at the construction of
takfiri thought and the influence of Sayyid Quṭb toward the next thought.
The results of this study show that the dominance of takfiri discourse in
Tafsir fī Ẓilāl al-Qur‟ān occurs through an exclusion mechanism which indicates
the existence of a domain of power and control of interpretation. The dominance
of the discourse can be seen in two aspects. First, the domain of the power of
takfiri thinking includes the interpretation of the QS. al-Mā‟idah [5]: 44 and 50
regarding the affirmation of the status of those who is not ruled by Allah‟s
Shari‟ah. Second, the control domain of takfiri thought includes the repetition of
takfiri discourse in interpretation which gives rise to takfiri effects and the
construction of knowledge of a person called a Muslim or a kafir. While in
genealogy, Sayyid Quṭb‟s takfiri thought can be seen through three discourse
constructions, namely takfiri discourse in the concepts of ḥākimiyah, ulūhiyah,
and jāhiliyah. These three become the spirit of interpretation as well as a person's
representation can be called accepting or rejecting God‟s law. This takfiri thought
marginalizes the bi al-riwāyah method, marginalizes the paradigm of the plurality
of religious meanings, ignores the opinions of classical scholars, and marginalizes
the concept of jāhiliyah according to the history of Islamic civilization. And also,
there is a normalization of the application of binary opposition interpretation,
prioritizing the interpretation of the bi al-ra‟yi method, generalizing the meaning
of infidel narrowly, objectivating Muslims as infidels and theocentrism as a model
of interpretation paradigm.
%K Takfiri, Sayyid Quṭb, Dominasi Wacana, Eksklusi, Genealogi.
%D 2021
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%L digilib47800