@phdthesis{digilib48504, month = {December}, title = {TINJAUAN TEORI RELATIVITAS KHUSUS BERDASARKAN REVOLUSI SAINTIFIK KUHN}, school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA}, author = {NIM.: 16690051 Muhammad Wahyudin Afrizqi}, year = {2021}, note = {Pembimbing: Rachmad Resmiyanto, S.Si., M.Sc.}, keywords = {Teori Relativitas Khusus, Revolusi Saintifik, Paradigma, Komunitas Ilmiah}, url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/48504/}, abstract = {Science and inquiry is one of the central issues in physics that cannot be ruled out in the efforts of science to enrich people's lives and culture. The purpose of this study is to explain the development history of the special theory of relativity from the scientific revolution?s point of view. This research is qualitative research using library research techniques in collecting data. The data in this study were analyzed using a qualitative descriptive method with a factual historical model that has several steps, namely: 1) Interpretation; 2) Internal coherence; 3) Holistics; 4) Historical continuity; 5) Description; and 6) Reflection. This research produces a history explanation of the special theory of relativity from the point of view of Kuhn's scientific revolution. The stages of special theory of relativity development are sequential from the pre-paradigm, paradigm, normal science, anomaly, crisis, to the scientific revolution. The conclusion obtained from this research is that the special theory of relativity has experienced a long phase for hundreds of years in its development. The paradigms that guided the research of the scientific community before the special theory of relativity were Newton's laws of motion and gravity and Huygens' theory of light waves which required the existence of ether as a medium for propagation of electromagnetic waves. The special theory of relativity corrected most of classical physics?s building and became one of the openings to the modern physics era. Einstein's publication of the special theory of relativity itself was not immediately accepted by the scientific community but had to go through a long debate in the scientific community. Planck states that scientists' disagreements over the implications of the special theory of relativity are like a child's inability to accept that there are other people walking under his feet on the other side of the earth. This is enough to show that discoveries in science are a puzzle-solving effort and tests in science are a competitive effort between paradigms for the loyalty of the scientific community. The attitude of the German scientific community in responding to the publication of the special theory of relativity tends to behave the same way, namely wanting the world as expected by a certain paradigm.} }