eprintid: 48716
rev_number: 14
eprint_status: archive
userid: 12243
dir: disk0/00/04/87/16
datestamp: 2022-01-19 07:11:26
lastmod: 2022-01-19 07:12:52
status_changed: 2022-01-19 07:11:26
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: muchti.nurhidaya@uin-suka.ac.id
creators_name: Nur Hadi, NIM.: 17300016085
title: KRITIK KH. MISBAH BIN ZAINIL MUSTAFA (1916-1994 M.) TERHADAP IDEOLOGI ISLAM TRADISIONAL DALAM TAFSIR AL-IKLIL FI MA’ANI AL-TANZIL
ispublished: pub
subjects: dzikir_
subjects: qh
divisions: pps_si
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: ideology criticism; traditional Islam; salawat; zikir
note: Promotor : Prof. Dr. H. Abdul Mustaqim, M.Ag dan Promotor :
Dr. H.Waryono, M.Ag
abstract: The theme studied in this research is why KH. Miṣbāḥ
criticized traditional Islam and said that it was NU representation,
while he himself was ulama of NU. The study focused on 1) How
was the ideology criticism followed by KH. Miṣbaḥ when Tafsir al-
Iklil fi Ma‘ani al-Tanzil was composed constructed? 2) Why did KH.
Miṣbaḥ criticize traditional Islam ideology in his Tafsir al-Iklil fi
Ma‘ani al-Tanzil? 3) What implications were there following KH.
Miṣbaḥ’s criticism of traditional Islam ideology in the Tafsir al-Iklil
fī Ma‘ani al-Tanzil?
This qualitative study applies the history of thought theory
formulated by Kuntowijoyo and utilizes three approaches. First, text
study; it involves the genesis of thought, the consistence of thought,
the evolution of thought, the systematics of thought, the development
and changes of ideology, the variant of thought, the communication
of thought, the internal dialectic and the continuity of thought and
intertextuality. Second, context study; the term ‘context’ in this study
means the surrounding situation and condition of the reader
(interpreter). Third, text and community study; it includes the
influence of thought, the implementation of thought, the
dissemination of thought, and the introduction of thought.
The results shows the followings. First, when criticizing the
traditional Islam ideology, KH. Miṣbaḥ inserted it in his book of
interpretation entitled al-Iklil fi Ma’ani al-Tanzil. The criticism is
divided into three scopes, namely observance, social, and cultural
scopes. Not only is al-Iklil interpretation an explaination of the
Quran verses, but it also is a criticism of the reality of social, politics, and culture or traditions that are not in line with the Quran and
hadith. KH. Misbah tried to be an intermediary whenever different
opinions appeared and tried to find the solutions so one party did not
claim to be true and the other was wrong. Second, there are two
factors that influence KH. Misbah to criticize traditional Islam
ideology, i.e. 1) internal factors 2) external factors. Third, al-Iklil interpretation affects the ideology of some of his relatives and those
who follow his mind set. It should be underlined that although KH.
Miṣbāḥ criticized traditional Islam, in particular NU, it did not mean
he was against NU traditions. The criticism he made or he inserted in
al-Iklīl interpretation was a way or method of practicing the tradition.
date: 2021-12-15
date_type: published
pages: 319
institution: UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
department: PASCASARJANA
thesis_type: doctoral
thesis_name: other
citation:   Nur Hadi, NIM.: 17300016085  (2021) KRITIK KH. MISBAH BIN ZAINIL MUSTAFA (1916-1994 M.) TERHADAP IDEOLOGI ISLAM TRADISIONAL DALAM TAFSIR AL-IKLIL FI MA’ANI AL-TANZIL.  Doctoral thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/48716/1/17300016085_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/48716/2/17300016085_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf