<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . . "PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY\r\nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS\r\nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA\r\n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020)"^^ . "Director is one of the most important and vital organs in maintaining the\r\nbusiness continuity of BUMN shareholder company. A director in carrying out the\r\nmanagement of the company must always adhere to the principle of fiduciary duty\r\nthat he has received. The fiduciary duty principle provides an obligation for the\r\nboard of directors to act in good faith, be careful and avoid conflicts of interest.\r\nThe problem that is feared to be an obstacle to the performance of directors and\r\ncause a conflict of interest is the practice of concurrent positions in the BUMN\r\nenvironment. Until now, although there are regulations regarding concurrent\r\npositions, in practice there are still many people who hold concurrent positions as\r\ndirectors and commissioners in many companies. This is the problem how the\r\nprinciple of fiduciary duty of directors can be implemented properly, if many\r\ndirectors and commissioners hold concurrent positions.\r\nThis study uses a normative approach, namely research conducted by\r\nconducting a literature study of library materials in the form of literature, laws\r\nand regulations and all matters relating to the problems discussed in it. The\r\ntheory used in this study is the theory of fiduciary duties, responsibilities of\r\ndirectors and concurrent positions.\r\nBased on the results of the study, it is stated that concurrent positions of\r\ndirectors and commissioners in BUMN shareholder company will only make the\r\nperformance of directors not optimal, can lead to unfair business competition and\r\nprone to conflicts of interest. The Board of Directors of PT Garuda Indonesia who\r\nconcurrently serves as a commissioner is proven to have violated the fiduciary\r\nduty principle, due to not having good intentions and conflict of interest.\r\nRegarding the responsibility of the board of directors if it violates the principle of\r\nfiduciary duty, Article 97 paragraph (3) of the Company Law stipulates that the\r\nboard of directors is personally responsible for the loss of the company if they are\r\nguilty and neglect to do so. out of their duty."^^ . "2021-12-13" . . . . "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . "FAKULTAS SYARI'AH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . . . . . . . "NIM.: 17103040113"^^ . "Prima Tedi Febriansah"^^ . "NIM.: 17103040113 Prima Tedi Febriansah"^^ . . . . . . "PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY\r\nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS\r\nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA\r\n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020) (Text)"^^ . . . "17103040113_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"^^ . . . "PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY\r\nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS\r\nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA\r\n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020) (Text)"^^ . . . "PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY\r\nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS\r\nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA\r\n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . . "PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY\r\nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS\r\nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA\r\n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY\r\nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS\r\nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA\r\n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY\r\nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS\r\nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA\r\n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . . "PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY\r\nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS\r\nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA\r\n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY\r\nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS\r\nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA\r\n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY\r\nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS\r\nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA\r\n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "PELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY\r\nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS\r\nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA\r\n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020) (Other)"^^ . . . . . "HTML Summary of #48932 \n\nPELAKSANAAN PRINSIP FIDUCIARY DUTY \nDIREKSI YANG MERANGKAP JABATAN KOMISARIS \nDI BADAN USAHA MILIK NEGARA \n(Studi Kasus PT Garuda Indonesia Tahun 2019-2020)\n\n" . "text/html" . . . "Ilmu Hukum" . .