TY  - THES
N1  - DR. H. RIYANTA, M.HUM.
ID  - digilib49623
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/49623/
A1  - FAJAR WAHYU MUSTIKOWATI, NIM: 18103040004
Y1  - 2022/01/10/
N2  - The reason for urgency in a accordance with Article 7 Paragraf (2) are no
other chices and it is imperative that a marriege takes place. The regulation does
not provide strict limits on urgent reason, so that there needs to be thoroughness
and caution for judges in formulating whether the urgents reason have been
fulfilled or not in the granting of the application for marriage dispensation. The
emphasis on the exitence of urgent reasons and sufficient evidence is actually to
press so that underage marriages are not carried out. In this study, the authors
examine several 2020 decisions at the Purworejo Religious Court to see the
interpretation of the judges? legal rights regarding the urgent reason for applying
for a marriage dispensation and their relevance to the concept of child protection. 
The research method used was descruptive analytical study with a juridical
approach to examine the legal interpretation of the judges on the concept of urgent
reasons proposed by the parties in the dispensation application and the suitability
of the interpretation with the concept of child protection in the applicable laws
and regulation. This study uses interview data collection techniques and
observations on decisions to obtain information related to urgent reasons which
are interpreted and determined by the judges at the Purworejo Religious Court.
The  theory used is the theory of child protection to analyzw the decision data
studied and primary legal materials and secondary legal materials that are used as
references in the analysis, as well as the results of interviews wirh judges at he
Purworejo Religious Court. 
The result of this study revaled: Frist, the urgent reasons for granting
dispensation for marrige were the child was already pregnant, the relationship was
too far, the education was law, and the parents were worried. Second, there was
no relevance between Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage and the
concept of child protection. This can be seen from the judge?s decision that
granted the application for dispencation for marriage only to protect children from
disscrimination from the surrounding community, but overrode other children?s
rights.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - urgent reason
KW  -  marriage
KW  -  marriage dispensation
KW  -  child protection
M1  - skripsi
TI  - PENAFSIRAN HAKIM TERHADAP ALASAN MENDESAK DALAM
PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN DAN KESESUAINNYA DENGAN 
KONSEP PERLINDUNGAN ANAK
(STUDI PUTUSAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA PURWOREJO TAHUN 

 
2020)
AV  - restricted
EP  - 121
ER  -