<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . . "EFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN\r\nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \r\n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA\r\nKERJA)"^^ . "Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation contains various changes \r\nto the provisions of the existing legislation or known as the omnibus law, one of\r\nwhich is the amendment to Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the Prohibition of\r\nMonopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition, namely the authority to\r\nadjudicate objections to the KPPU's decision. From before, the authority of the\r\nDistrict Court shifted to the authority of the Commercial Court. To implement\r\nthese provisions, the Supreme Court has issued Circular Letter (SEMA) number\r\n1 of 2021 which basically determines: The District Court will no longer accept\r\nobjections to the KPPU's decision as of February 2, 2021 and instruct the\r\nCommercial Court to accept, examine and adjudicate cases of objection to the\r\nKPPU's decision. \r\nThere are differences in terms of the competence of judges, case settlement\r\nprocedures and the limitations of the existing commercial courts. In assessing\r\nwhether the transfer of authority to adjudicate brings changes and is effective in\r\nresolving cases in accordance with the objectives of the Job Creation Act, fulfilling\r\naspects of the legal objectives for the realization of legal certainty, justice and\r\nbenefit, a research is carried out using a normative juridical method approach which\r\nis based on a literature study in the form of statutory regulations, scientific works\r\nin the field of law, academic literature such as theses, theses related to the research\r\ntheme and opinions of experts in their fields. \r\nBusiness Competition is a family of economic law that requires an economics\r\napproach in examining, analyzing regulations, assessing evidence and deciding\r\ncases against the KPPU's decision, and Commercial Court Judges as special judges\r\nwho have been certified to have competence in the field of business competition\r\nlaw and economic law, so that the authority. The Commercial Court in handling\r\ncases of objection to the KPPU's decision is considered appropriate, effective and\r\nis expected to be able to fulfill the legal objectives, namely the creation of certainty,\r\njustice and legal benefits"^^ . "2022-01-14" . . . . "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . "FAKULTAS SYARI'AH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . . . . . . . "NIM. 18103040071"^^ . "SAKA ABIBIKAR"^^ . "NIM. 18103040071 SAKA ABIBIKAR"^^ . . . . . . "EFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN\r\nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \r\n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA\r\nKERJA) (Text)"^^ . . . . . "18103040071_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"^^ . . . "EFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN\r\nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \r\n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA\r\nKERJA) (Text)"^^ . . . . . "EFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN\r\nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \r\n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA\r\nKERJA) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "EFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN\r\nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \r\n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA\r\nKERJA) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "EFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN\r\nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \r\n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA\r\nKERJA) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "EFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN\r\nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \r\n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA\r\nKERJA) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "EFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN\r\nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \r\n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA\r\nKERJA) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . . "EFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN\r\nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \r\n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA\r\nKERJA) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "EFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN\r\nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \r\n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA\r\nKERJA) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "EFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN\r\nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \r\n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA\r\nKERJA) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . "HTML Summary of #49689 \n\nEFEKTIFITAS KEWENANGAN MENGADILI PERKARA KEBERATAN \nPUTUSAN KPPU OLEH PENGADILAN NIAGA \n(STUDI KASUS ATAS UU NO. 11 TAHUN 2020 TENTANG CIPTA \nKERJA)\n\n" . "text/html" . . . "Ilmu Hukum" . .