TY  - THES
N1  - Pembimbing: Nurainun Mangunsong, S.H., M.Hum
ID  - digilib51059
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/51059/
A1  - Sintia Kurniawati, NIM.: 18103040098
Y1  - 2022/01/25/
N2  - Government Regulation (PP) Number 18 of 2021 concerning Management Rights, Land Rights, Flat Units, and Land Registration which was ratified on February 2, 2021 has caused a lot of polemics in the community, especially regarding the formulation of norms or their substance. The PP is a derivative of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation. The purpose of the PP is to increase investment and provide convenience in various aspects of the arrangement for granting tenure of land rights. However, there has been disharmony in the substance contained in the PP, namely not accommodating the Constitutional Court's Decision Number 21-22/PUU-V/2007 regarding the review of Law Number 25 of 2007 concerning Investment (UUPM) by canceling Article 22 of the Act. The ruling ordered the following: that for the granting of a term of land rights, it must refer to the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA). However, in practice, there are differences in the arrangement of the terms of granting land rights. This is the focus of the researcher's study.
This research is qualitative, the type of research is library research. This study uses a juridical normative approach. This study uses the theory of the hierarchy of laws and regulations, harmonization and the theory of Land Management Rights.
The results of the study that the occurrence of disharmony in Government Regulation no. 18 of 2021 with the Basic Agrarian Law on the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 21-22/PUU-V/2007 is caused by 2 (two) factors, the first is internal factors in the form of political, social, and cultural changes. The two external factors are the need to carry out economic reforms. So efforts to harmonize laws and regulations, especially government regulations, are carried out at every stage of the formation of government regulations that are harmonized both vertically and horizontally, both the formation principle and the material principle of the content of laws and regulations including harmonizing them with the Constitutional Court's Decision, this of course requires awareness, obedience, and cooperation from various parties, especially state institutions that become the address of the decision.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - Disharmoni
KW  -  Hak Pengelolaan Tanah
KW  -  Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi
M1  - skripsi
TI  - DISHARMONI
ANTARA PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 18 TAHUN 2021 TENTANG HAK PENGELOLAAN, HAK ATAS TANAH, SATUAN RUMAH SUSUN DAN PENDAFTARAN TANAH DENGAN UNDANG- UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1960 TENTANG POKOK- POKOK AGRARIA ATAS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI
NOMOR 21-22/PUU-V/2007
AGAMA BANTUL TAHUN 2015-2021
AV  - restricted
EP  - 153
ER  -