%0 Thesis
%9 Skripsi
%A Izzuddin, NIM.: 15550030
%B FAKULTAS USHULUDDIN DAN PEMIKIRAN ISLAM
%D 2022
%F digilib:54356
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Hadis, Common Link, Harald Motzki, Isnad cum Matn
%P 181
%T HISTORISITAS HADIS NON-HUKUM (KAJIAN ISNAD CUM MATN  TERHADAP HADIS ANJURAN MEMBUNUH CICAK)
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/54356/
%X In general, the interest of western scholars in knowing the historicity,  originality, and authenticity of everything results in source criticism. One of the  sources of Islam which has received a lot of criticism from Western scholars is the  hadith. Goldziher, Schacht and Juynboll have criticized the origins of the hadith  emergence. They mutually reinforce the argument that “hadith is the fabrication  results of scholars’ in the 2nd and 3rd centuries of Hijrah.” This assumption  emerged after they conducted research on legal hadiths used for the authorities’  interests, legal legitimacy, and that for schools in theology. This is the very point I  use to start raising a question over “what if the research focuses on neutral  hadiths, i.e., those which have no connection with such interests of certain  groups? Will the argument on historicity that is laid over the legal hadiths also  occur to non-legal hadiths?”  In this research, I focus on hadiths advising to kill wazagh (lizards) that  have no relation to law and thus neutral from the authorities’ interests. The  research method I use to trace the history of the hadiths is isnād cum matn offered  by Harald Motzki. Isnād cum matn is a method that is based on dating of hadith  through analysis and study of transmission lines (isnād), as well as collecting and  comparing variations of hadith texts (matn) from pre-, post-, and canonical books  of hadith collection. The first I take was to collect the narration paths of the hadith  in question by using al-maktabah al-syāmilah application. Therein I found 117  hadiths with various narrations preserved by 27 hadith collectors. Then, I divided  it into four (4) diagram bundles according to the characters contained in the  matan. I put color in the diagram lines to indicates that the reconstruction of the  bundle is considering the corresponding matan and to some extent shows its  polarization. The results of the analysis of sanad and matan diagram 1 mentioned  Suhail (w. 138) as a common link. The analysis in diagram 2 mentioned ‘Abd al-  Ḥamīd Ibn Jubair as a common link. Then, the analysis of diagram 3 showed al-  Zuhrī as a common link in the hadith. The analysis of sanad and matan in diagram  4 had many single narrations. Therefore, the isnād cum matn analysis to the hadith  advising to kill the lizard shows that the hadiths were supposedly circulating  around the end of the 1st century to the middle of the 2nd century Hijriah in  Medina.
%Z Pembimbing: Dr. Ali Imran, S.Th.I, M.S.I.