<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . . "POLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF\r\nHAK ASASI MANUSIA"^^ . "Caning in Aceh is a privilege obtained by the Aceh Region for\r\nimplementing Islamic law; this privilege is regulated in Law Number 44 of 1999\r\nconcerning the Implementation of Aceh Privileges. The implementation of Islamic\r\nlaw is supported by the Aceh Qanun, which regulates the implementation of Islamic\r\nlaw as a whole. In the implementation of caning punishment in Aceh, there are\r\nvarious perceptions, both among those who are pro-caning punishment and among\r\nthose who are against caning punishment, which is considered to violate human\r\nrights. In this study, there are two formulations of the problem raised, namely: (1)\r\nWhat is the justification for caning in Aceh Qanun according to the criminal law\r\npolicy? (2) What is the argument for caning in Aceh Qanun from a human rights\r\nperspective?\r\nIn this study, researchers used qualitative research methods. Qualitative\r\nmethods place a greater emphasis on observing phenomena and delving into the\r\nsubstance of their meaning. The analysis and acumen of qualitative research are\r\ngreatly affected by the strength of the words and sentences used. The authors used\r\nqualitative analysis methods in this study to further their studies and descriptions.\r\nThe compiler then draws conclusions deductively, that is, by moving from general\r\nto specific information. This research uses library research, which is a series of\r\nstudies using library data collection methods.\r\nCaning punishment in Aceh is in accordance with the principle of\r\npenalization in criminal law policy, namely, the fulfillment of economic principles,\r\nthe fulfillment of humanist principles, and the fulfillment of the principle of justice.\r\nLooking at the above arguments, it is clear that caning is a violation of human rights\r\nbecause it is not in accordance with the law that regulates the prohibition of torture.\r\nHowever, due to the existence of caning in Aceh due to the privileges that regulate\r\nthe area to implement Islamic law, in accordance with article 18B of the 1945\r\nConstitution that the state respects the privileges of a region and article 28J\r\nconcerning restrictions on the rights of citizens, caning in Aceh is a punishment that\r\ndoes not violate human rights."^^ . "2023-01-24" . . . . "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . "FAKULTAS SYARIAH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . . . . . . . "NIM.: 17103040089"^^ . "Achmad Yazid Bistomi"^^ . "NIM.: 17103040089 Achmad Yazid Bistomi"^^ . . . . . . "POLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF\r\nHAK ASASI MANUSIA (Text)"^^ . . . . . "17103040089_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"^^ . . . "POLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF\r\nHAK ASASI MANUSIA (Text)"^^ . . . "POLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF\r\nHAK ASASI MANUSIA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "POLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF\r\nHAK ASASI MANUSIA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "POLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF\r\nHAK ASASI MANUSIA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "POLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF\r\nHAK ASASI MANUSIA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "POLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF\r\nHAK ASASI MANUSIA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . . "POLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF\r\nHAK ASASI MANUSIA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "POLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF\r\nHAK ASASI MANUSIA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "POLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF\r\nHAK ASASI MANUSIA (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . "HTML Summary of #58525 \n\nPOLEMIK HUKUMAN CAMBUK DALAM QANUN ACEH PERSPEKTIF \nHAK ASASI MANUSIA\n\n" . "text/html" . . . "HAK ASASI MANUSIA" . . . "Ilmu Hukum" . .