eprintid: 59705
rev_number: 11
eprint_status: archive
userid: 12460
dir: disk0/00/05/97/05
datestamp: 2023-07-10 01:50:46
lastmod: 2023-07-10 01:50:46
status_changed: 2023-07-10 01:50:46
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id
creators_name: Fiska Raisa Husna, NIM.: 19103040052
title: ANALISIS YURIDIS KEPEMILIKAN TANAH WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA NONPRIBUMI BERDASARKAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ATAU NOMINEE (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 180/PDT.G/2020/PN YYK)
ispublished: pub
subjects: il_huk
subjects: isl_agr
divisions: il_hum
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Perjanjian Nominee, Hak Milik, Penyelundupan Hukum
note: Pembimbing: Dr. Sri Wahyuni, S.Ag., M.Ag., M.Hum
abstract: This research discusses the nominee agreement because in the Yogyakarta
District Court Decision Number 180/Pdt.G/2020/Pn Yyk namely the Plaintiff was
hit by a Circular Letter of the Head of DIY Number K.898/I/A/1975 which states
that non-native Indonesian citizens are prohibited register land rights as property
rights. Due to a conflict with a regulation, the Plaintiff entered into a nominee
agreement with the Defendant in the Property Rights Certificate. The problem is
that when the Plaintiff wants to process the transfer of rights to be in his name
with land status other than ownership rights, but the Defendant does not want that.
This study uses normative research methods with the type of library
research to analyze decisions related to loan agreements. In this study, the
authors used sources such as Law Number 5 of 1960, Yogyakarta District Court
Decision Number 180/Pdt.G/2020/Pn Yyk, books, journals, and theses that
discuss loan agreements or nominees. As well as the theoretical framework in the
form of the agreement theory, the theory of land ownership, and the theory of
realia statute.
The results of the study show that the judge's legal considerations in this
decision stated that the plaintiff's lawsuit was unacceptable due to a lack of
parties as well as a loan agreement or nominee that contradicted the Circular of
the Head of DIY Number K.898/I/A/1975 could be considered as smuggling of law
and the agreement canceled in the first place or never existed. This means that the
practice of borrowing agreements or nominees is not valid and the parties
involved in these practices may be subject to legal sanctions.
date: 2023-05-30
date_type: published
pages: 125
institution: UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
department: FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM
thesis_type: skripsi
thesis_name: other
citation:   Fiska Raisa Husna, NIM.: 19103040052  (2023) ANALISIS YURIDIS KEPEMILIKAN TANAH WARGA NEGARA INDONESIA NONPRIBUMI BERDASARKAN PERJANJIAN PINJAM NAMA ATAU NOMINEE (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI YOGYAKARTA NOMOR 180/PDT.G/2020/PN YYK).  Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/59705/1/19103040052_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/59705/2/19103040052_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf