TY  - THES
N1  - Pembimbing: Dr. Mutiullah, S.Fil.I., M.Hum.
ID  - digilib61909
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/61909/
A1  - Nursyah Putra Sungkono, NIM.: 18105010044
Y1  - 2023/07/18/
N2  - The discourse on deconstruction has been a central focus in contemporary
intellectual studies. This research discusses the relationship between
deconstruction and negative theology in the context of Jacques Derrida's thought.
Through a critical analysis of Derrida's texts, this study aims to understand how
deconstruction can reflect on the discourse of negative theology. Moreover, this
research also tries to explain the dialectic that occurs between deconstruction and
negative theology and attempts to re-read more carefully the connection between
them. The formulation of the problem of this research includes the questions: (1)
How is the dialectic of deconstruction and negative theology? This question
contains four points of discussion, namely: the relation of deconstruction and
negative theology, the contribution of deconstruction to negative theology, the
critique of deconstruction to negative theology, and the deficiency/obstacle of
deconstruction to negative theology; and (2) How is the relevance of Derrida?s
negative theology for the development of kalam science?
This study employs a qualitative approach with documentation as the data
collection technique. The primary data used is Derrida's article titled "How to
Avoid Speaking: Denials", which serves as the main source for understanding
Derrida's thoughts on deconstruction and negative theology. The deconstruction
theory developed by Derrida is used as the foundation for analyzing and
interpreting the related concepts.
The findings of this research reveal that deconstruction and negative
theology have a close relationship in Derrida's thought. Derrida has shown an
enduring interest in negative theology throughout his career, and there are
fundamental similarities between deconstruction and negative theology in their
efforts to transcend the limitations of language and seek absolute experiences or
understandings of heterogeneity. However, Derrida also recognizes that
deconstruction has some shortcomings, particularly in its excessive use of
negation, which can be perceived as nihilism or a lack of understanding. In its
contribution to negative theology, deconstruction offers a non-reductive approach
and emphasizes the diversity of negative theological traditions. Derrida rejects
narrow views that consider only one form of negative theology. In this context,
deconstruction brings the tradition of theology into a new context. In its relation to
Islam, Derrida?s negative theology is relevant for the development of kalam
science because it provides criticism and alternatives to the traditional paradigm
that claims to know and communicate with God positively and definitively.
However, kalam science is not compatible with Derrida?s negative theology that
denies reason and revelation as sources of knowledge about God, and does not
provide evidence or interpretation that supports faith and science.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - Dekonstruksi
KW  -  Teologi Negatif
KW  -  Ilmu Kalam
KW  -  Derrida
M1  - skripsi
TI  - TEOLOGI NEGATIF JACQUES DERRIDA DAN RELEVANSINYA BAGI PENGEMBANGAN ILMU KALAM
AV  - restricted
EP  - 143
ER  -