<> "The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license."^^ . <> . . . "IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN)"^^ . "The contact of children with the criminal justice system is the beginning of\r\nchildren dealing with the law. The Juvenile Criminal Justice System must be\r\ninterpreted not only to deal with the punishment of children, but also to cover the\r\nroot of the problem. Issues that need to be considered in the sentencing of children\r\ninclude issues of education that need to be given to the convicted child. Therefore,\r\nthe imposition of crimes against children is certainly different from the imposition\r\nof crimes on adults and instead the provisions referred to as \"Kinderstafrecht\" or\r\ncriminal law are made which do not deviate from the criminal law that applies to\r\nadults. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the implementation\r\nof the crime against the child who committed the crime of theft and the Judge's\r\nconsiderations in sentencing the child in decision Number 23/Pid.Sus-\r\nAnak/2022/PN. Smn.\r\nThis research is a library research research, is descriptive analytical and\r\nanalyzes data using descriptive qualitative methods. The approach used is a\r\nnormative approach by examining the applicable laws and regulations. A review\r\nof the theories used by the authors in compiling this thesis are the theory of\r\npunishment, the theory of criminal responsibility and the theory of criminal acts.\r\nFrom the results of the study, it can be concluded that the judge in\r\nimposing sentences on children is in accordance with the Law on the Juvenile\r\nCriminal Justice System and the best interests of the convicted child, where the\r\njudge does not impose prison sentences on the convicted child and the\r\nconsiderations of the judge in deciding child cases include the public prosecutor's\r\nindictment, evidence and evidence in the form of witness statements, defendant\r\nstatements, articles of criminal law regulations contained in the Criminal Code as\r\nwell as the facts in the trial.The contact of children with the criminal justice system is the beginning of\r\nchildren dealing with the law. The Juvenile Criminal Justice System must be\r\ninterpreted not only to deal with the punishment of children, but also to cover the\r\nroot of the problem. Issues that need to be considered in the sentencing of children\r\ninclude issues of education that need to be given to the convicted child. Therefore,\r\nthe imposition of crimes against children is certainly different from the imposition\r\nof crimes on adults and instead the provisions referred to as \"Kinderstafrecht\" or\r\ncriminal law are made which do not deviate from the criminal law that applies to\r\nadults. This research was conducted with the aim of knowing the implementation\r\nof the crime against the child who committed the crime of theft and the Judge's\r\nconsiderations in sentencing the child in decision Number 23/Pid.Sus-\r\nAnak/2022/PN. Smn.\r\nThis research is a library research research, is descriptive analytical and\r\nanalyzes data using descriptive qualitative methods. The approach used is a\r\nnormative approach by examining the applicable laws and regulations. A review\r\nof the theories used by the authors in compiling this thesis are the theory of\r\npunishment, the theory of criminal responsibility and the theory of criminal acts.\r\nFrom the results of the study, it can be concluded that the judge in\r\nimposing sentences on children is in accordance with the Law on the Juvenile\r\nCriminal Justice System and the best interests of the convicted child, where the\r\njudge does not impose prison sentences on the convicted child and the\r\nconsiderations of the judge in deciding child cases include the public prosecutor's\r\nindictment, evidence and evidence in the form of witness statements, defendant\r\nstatements, articles of criminal law regulations contained in the Criminal Code as\r\nwell as the facts in the trial."^^ . "2023-08-01" . . . . "UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . "FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA"^^ . . . . . . . . . "NIM.: 19103040013"^^ . "Diah Ayu Naziah"^^ . "NIM.: 19103040013 Diah Ayu Naziah"^^ . . . . . . "IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN) (Text)"^^ . . . . . "19103040013_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf"^^ . . . "IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN) (Text)"^^ . . . . . "IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . . "IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . . "IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "lightbox.jpg"^^ . . . "IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "preview.jpg"^^ . . . "IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "medium.jpg"^^ . . . "IMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN) (Other)"^^ . . . . . . "small.jpg"^^ . . "HTML Summary of #63134 \n\nIMPLEMENTASI PIDANA TERHADAP KASUS PENCURIAN OLEH ANAK (STUDI PUTUSAN PN SLEMAN NOMOR 23/PID.SUS-ANAK/2022/PN SMN)\n\n" . "text/html" . . . "Pidana Anak" . .