%A NIM.: 17103040137 M. Ansori
%O Pembimbing: Gilang Kresnanda Annas.SH. MH.
%T ANALISIS YURIDIS PUTUSAN HAKIM TENTANG TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI KASUS SUAP PENGADAAN BANTUAN SOSIAL (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN NOMOR. 29/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/PN. Jkt.Pst)
%X The judge's consideration has used unreasonable considerations as a thing
that lightens the sentence for the defendant. Such absurdity is contained in the
judges' mitigating considerations, namely “the defendant has been reproached
enough, beaten by society when at that time the defendant has not been found
guilty.” The study seeks to answer two questions namely: (1) What is the part of
the judge's consideration in deciding the case on the verdict Number 29/pid.sustpk/
2021/pn.jkt.pst and (2) How the abuse forms authority exercised by the
defendant in the case.
This research is a literature research that is descriptive-analytical, using a
normative approach. This study aims to collect data from various literature related
to research, such as court decisions, laws and regulations, and other literature by
analyzing documents, archives, official records in order to synchronize between
various theories and implementations.
There is an inaccuracy in the use of articles used by law enforcement in
handling the case of the accused in Decision Number. 29/Pid.Sus-
Tpk/2021/PN.Jkt.Pst. JPB was charged with violating Articles 11 and 12 b of Law
No. 31 of 1999 and the defendant was sentenced to 12 years in prison. The accused
should be charged under Article 2 paragraph (2), namely life imprisonment or the
death penalty. The author concludes as follows: (1) the judge's consideration
regarding the sentence given in the case of corruption cases committed by state
administrators, namely the defendant is less than optimal because the defendant is
only sentenced to 12 years in prison while the defendant should be sentenced to life
or the death penalty. (2) The judge's consideration of mitigating matters for the
accused is very unreasonable because the defendant has been reviled and cursed
enough by the public and it is a mitigating matter for the accused.
%K Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan, Keadaan
Darurat
%D 2023
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%L digilib63784