%0 Thesis
%9 Masters
%A Izzatul Ulya, NIM.: 19203012042
%B FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM
%D 2024
%F digilib:64995
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Putusan, Mahkamah, Siyasah Qaḍa‟iyyah
%P 136
%T PUTUSAN MAJELIS KEHORMATAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI (MKMK) TERHADAP PUTUSAN MK NOMOR 90/PUU-XXI/2023 DALAM PERSPEKTIF SIYĀSAH QAḌĀ’IYYAH IMAM AL-MAWARDI
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/64995/
%X The Chairman of the Constitutional Court, Anwar Usman, partially granted the petition regarding Article 169 letter q of Law Number 7 of 2017 submitted by Surakarta University Student, Almas Tsaqibbirru, in Case Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023. However, after the decision, Anwar Usman was proven to have violated the code of ethics seriously and was dismissed from the Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court. Based on Constitutional Court Honorary Council Decision Number 2/MKMK/L/11/2023, Anwar Usman was proven to have violated the principles of integrity, competence and equality, independence, impartiality, and appropriateness and politeness contained in the Sapta Karsa Hutama. Based on this, the author is interested in studying it from the perspective of Imam al-Mawardi's siyāsah qaḍā‟iyyah.  This type of research is library research with the nature of descriptive analysis research and uses a normative juridical approach (statue approach). The primary legal materials used are regulations regarding the requirements for presidential and vice presidential candidacy, Constitutional Court Decisions, and MKMK Decisions, while the secondary legal materials used are books, journals or scientific papers and documents covering the requirements for presidential candidacy and vice President.  The results of this research regarding the resolution of the Constitutional Court Honorary Council's decision to dismiss Anwar Usman as judge is an action that is in accordance with the perspective of siyāsah qaḍā'iyyah Imam al-Mawardi, namely dismissing Anwar Usman as Chief Justice of the Constitutional Court and not allowing him to be involved or involve himself in the examination and decision making in the case dispute over the results of the Presidential and Vice Presidential elections, The House of Representatives, Regional Board and Regional Legislative Council Member Elections, as well as the Governor, Regent and Mayor Elections. Regarding the legal status of Constitutional Court Decision Number 90 following MKMK Decision Number 2, based on Imam al-Mawardi's siyāsah qaḍhā'iyyah, the decision is invalid because it does not comply with the requirements of fairness and independence, in this case the principles of integrity, competence and equality, independence, impartiality , and propriety and politeness.
%Z Pembimbing: Dr. H. Ahmad Bahiej, S.H., M.Hum.