TY  - THES
N1  - Pembimbing: Nurainun Mangunsong, S.H, M.Hum
ID  - digilib65008
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/65008/
A1  - Dona Armania Putri, NIM.: 20103040068
Y1  - 2024/03/08/
N2  - Indonesia, as a legal state, undoubtedly has a constitution as a guide in organizing the state to align with the ideals and objectives on which the Indonesian nation was founded. Therefore, the Constitutional Court is present to safeguard the values embedded in the constitution, ensuring that the governance of the state stays true to the nation's goals and aspirations. The constitution also exists to limit the state's power, preventing arbitrary actions and violations of human rights. The Constitutional Court operates with four authorities and one obligation in carrying out its duties. However, with the evolving times, it is felt that the Constitutional Court's authority is insufficient to protect citizens' basic rights due to the absence of the constitutional complaint authority, which allows citizens to file complaints regarding violations of their rights by government actions or inactions.
Considering the data from 2022, which recorded 1,278 cases of human rights violations, there is a need for a state institution to address such violations against citizens resulting from government actions or inactions. This necessitates a comparative analysis of countries that have implemented constitutional complaints to understand the procedural aspects of their implementation.
This research utilizes a comparative and normative juridical approach, with data collection conducted through library research. The study's content is qualitative and yields descriptive-analytical data.
The findings indicate that South Korea has been implementing the constitutional complaint system since the establishment of its Constitutional Court, and this authority is explicitly outlined in the South Korean constitution. There is an opportunity for Indonesia to implement constitutional complaints by amending the 1945 Constitution to include the authority of the Constitutional Court. However, this is a political inevitability, given the lengthy procedure and the lack of urgent necessity for amendment implementation. Additionally, garnering consensus within the legislative body proves challenging. Two alternatives to implement constitutional complaints without amending the constitution are through judicial interpretation and legislative interpretation.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - Mahkamah Konstitusi
KW  -  Constitutional Complaint
KW  -  Amandemen
KW  -  Hak Asasi Manusia
M1  - skripsi
TI  - ANALISIS KOMPARATIF URGENSI PENERAPAN CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINT DI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI INDONESIA DAN KOREA SELATAN: TANTANGAN DAN PELUANG
AV  - restricted
EP  - 130
ER  -