TY  - THES
N1  - Pembimbing: Malik Ibrahim, M.Ag
ID  - digilib65738
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/65738/
A1  - Nadia Nurul Afifah, NIM.: 20103050058
Y1  - 2024/04/05/
N2  - The religious court is a place that has the duty and authority to examine, decide and resolve cases at the first level between people who are Muslim in the fields of: marriage, inheritance, wills, grants, endowments, zakat, sadaqah and sharia economics in Indonesia, apart from upholding legal justice, courts also have the principles of simplicity, speed and low costs. In realizing this principle, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia has utilized existing technological developments to carry out development in stages, starting from the SIPP application, continuing with e-court and then e-litigation in accordance with Perma No. 1 of 2019. In 2023, e-litigation users at the Sleman Religious Court will not yet reach 50% of users who register their cases via e-court, even though this is a step towards simple, fast and low-cost justice. This research aims to determine the factors of parties who register their cases in e-court but do not resolve them in e-litigation and review the sociology of Islamic law regarding the minimal use of e-litigation in the Sleman Religious Courts. This type of research is field research with a sociological approach to Islamic law, the nature of the research uses descriptive analysis, namely describing the factors of the parties who register their cases via e-court but do not resolve them via e-litigation in divorce cases in the Religious Courts. Sleman so that it can be reviewed and analyzed with the sociology of Islamic law. The data analysis method uses qualitative deductive methods. Then, the data collection method uses interviews and documentation methods. The results of the research on the Implementation of Perma No. 1 of 2019 concerning Electronic Case Administration and Hearings in Divorce Cases at the Sleman Religious Courts is divided into 2 conclusions. Firstly, there are 6 (six) factors conveyed by sources regarding the parties not resolving their cases through e-litigation, namely: network and system problems, the opposing party was not present at the first hearing, the opposing party did not agree to an electronic hearing, the party did not use a power of attorney. law, the litigants do not understand IT, the parties have stability if the trial is conducted conventionally. Second, the results of an analysis of the sociological review of Islamic law regarding the minimal use of e-litigation in the Sleman Religious Court in divorce settlement cases, namely because there are still obstacles or problems so that the number of cases resolved through e-litigation has only reached 11% of the cases registered through e-court .
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - Perma No. 1 Tahun 2019
KW  -  E-litigasi
KW  -  Sosiologi Hukum Islam
M1  - skripsi
TI  - IMPLEMENTASI PERMA NO. 1 TAHUN 2019 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PERKARA DAN PERSIDANGAN SECARA ELEKTRONIK DALAM PERKARA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA SLEMAN TAHUN 2023
AV  - restricted
EP  - 130
ER  -