TY  - THES
N1  - Promotor: Prof. Dr. K.H. Abdul Mustaqim, S.Ag., M.Ag dan  Dr. Phil. Munirul Ikhwan, Lc., M.A
ID  - digilib67331
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/67331/
A1  - Afrida Arinal Muna, NIM.: 21300011055
Y1  - 2024/08/28/
N2  - This research is motivated by academic concerns about the influence of qira?at (variant readings of the Qur?an) on the interpretation of legal verses in the early Islamic period (2nd to 3rd Century AH). During this time, copies of the Qur?an provided direct insight into the variant readings circulating before the canonization of qira?at. Although qira?at was not yet canonical like in the time of Ibn Mujahid, the differences in Qur?anic readings were already acknowledged by the fuqaha (Islamic jurists), making qira?at one of the legal considerations. The research addresses several questions: Why is qira?at used as one of the considerations in legal istinbat (the process of deriving legal rulings)? What is the relationship between qira?at and the schools of fikih (Islamic jurisprudence) in the 2nd to 3rd Century AH? How is qira?at used in istinbat a?kam (derivation of legal rulings) by the fuqaha of the four schools of thought? And how consistent are the readings of the fuqaha with the readings popularly followed in their areas? 
This research employs an in-depth literature review. Data was gathered through extensive searches in libraries and online article/journal platforms. Talking about qira?at and a?kam verses, the epistemological framework used in this study focuses on how the fuqaha formulated legal doctrines considering aspects of qira?at, whether as a primary tool or a supporting factor. The study investigates the basis on which certain fuqaha chose specific qurra? (Qur?anic reciters), whether it was based on popularity or readings that supported their legal interpretations. This epistemological study examines the use of qira?at by the fuqaha during the formative period of the fikih schools of thought (2nd to 3rd Century AH), before qira?at became canonical. It aims to understand how qira?at influenced the fuqaha?s legal reasoning and its impact on the later standardization of qira?at. 
The study?s findings are as follows: 1) The relationship between fuqaha and qira?at can be explained through three factors: the characteristics of each fuqaha, the fame and qualifications of an imam (a leader in religious law), and geographical relations. It is concluded that the practice of fikih during the early formative period of the four schools of thought influenced and contributed to the discursive selection of qira?at during its canonization. The qurra? referenced by the fuqaha, such as Nafi?, Ibn Kath?r, ?A?im, and Ab? ?Amr, were included in Ibn Mujahid?s standardization process, indicating that fikih practices provided epistemological support for these qurra during the canonization of qira?at. 2) Epistemologically, qira?at is used as one of the indicators in legal istinbat considerations because it is a part of the way the Qur?an was read, which is one of the sources of legal istinbat. Qira?at is utilized by mufassir/fuqaha? both practically and as a legal consideration because it is integral to the Qur?an?s revelation and its acceptance by the audience. 3) In various legal themes where differences in qira?at lead to differences in meaning and legal consequences, each scholar from the Islamic schools of jurisprudence has their own reading preferences. The choice of qira?at by the fuqaha is influenced by the social context of the 2nd to 3rd Century AH when qira?at was not yet canonical but well-known among the fuqaha. Although it is often said that fuqaha follow the famous school of reading in their area, research shows that they did not always consistently adhere to one school of reading. Their preferences were influenced by the legal sources and the social conditions present at the time of law formulation.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - Qira?at
KW  -  Mazhab Fikih
KW  -  Istinbat Hukum
KW  -  Abad 2 dan 3 H
M1  - doctoral
TI  - RELASI QIRA?AT DAN ISTINBAT HUKUM PADA ABAD II-III HIJRIYAH
AV  - restricted
EP  - 251
ER  -