TY  - THES
N1  - Pembimbing: Prof. Dr. Zuhri, M.Ag.
ID  - digilib68259
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/68259/
A1  - Muhammad Syamil Basayif, NIM.: 22205011022
Y1  - 2024/08/15/
N2  - The discussion of al-Ghaz?l?'s thought is often isolated within the
dichotomy of metaphysics and sufism. The glorification of this discussion indirectly shuts out his expertise in other branches of philosophy such as logic, where he wrote Mi'y?r al-'Ilm, Mi?akk al-Na?r, and al-Qis??s al-Mustaq?m. Of course, these three
works are not talking about the same themes and discussions. Each stands on its own style and characteristics. This research aims to review his logical discourse, especially the concepts of syllogism and analogy. Detailing the concepts of
syllogism and analogy in his three works is the first step of this research. The next
work is to examine the implementation of syllogism and analogy in I?ya' 'Ulum al- D?n which is a comprehensive representation of al-Ghaz?l?'s thought. The extent of their role as the basis of argument construction in the I?y?'. The chapters chosen
reflect specific scientific disciplines. Among others, 'Ilm (epistemology), qaw?'id al-aq?'id (theology), hal?l-har?m (jurisprudence), and 'aj?'ib al-qalb (sufism).
This research is a library research with documentation method. This means utilising written sources as the main reference. Primary data sources of formal objects use Mi'y?r, Mi?akk, and Qis??s. While the material object primary data is I?y?' 'Ul?m al-D?n. The secondary data are al-Ghaz?l?'s other works such as
Maq??id al-Fal?sifah and al-Musta?f?, as well as the works of other scholars such
as al-Man?iq 'inda al-Ghazali and It??f al-S?d?? al-Muttaq?n which are commentaries on I?ya'. The data collected is then analysed with the concept of syllogism and analogy. The research problem, First, how does al-Ghazali build the concept of syllogism and analogy in Mi'yar, Mi?akk, and Qistas? Secondly, how is
the implementation of syllogism and analogy as the basis of argument construction in I?ya' Ulam al-Din? The result of this study are, first, the concept of logic in Mi'y?r is still thick
with nuances of Greek terminology, Mi?akk is more adaptive to fiqh discourse, and Qis??s is a full representation of logic dressed in the legitimacy of the Quran. Despite the evolution of terminology, all three agree that valid arguments can be constructed with syllogism (qiy?s) and analogy (ta???l). Secondly, I?y?' 'Ul?m al-
D?n utilises these two patterns of reasoning as a fundamental basis in constructing various arguments. In the epistemology chapter, the hierarchisation and classification of knowledge is a logical implication of the implementation of syllogism. In theological discourse, al-Ghaz?l? did reject analogy, but syllogism
strengthened the hegemony of the Asy'?riyyah as a school that combines naql? and 'aql? arguments in harmony. Analogy only became dominant in jurisprudence. In the discourse of sufism, syllogism is occasionally glimpsed and analogy has a larger
portion as an approach in understanding abstract things. Thirdly, the implementation of syllogisms and analogies, which are part of philosophical discourse, shows that the content of I?y?' is also philosophical. Al-Ghazali, who has been portrayed as the destroyer of philosophy, in fact still utilises philosophy - specifically logic - in the construction of arguments in the I?ya'.
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - syllogism; analogies; al-Ghazali; I?ya' Ulum al-Din
M1  - masters
TI  - IMPLEMENTASI SILOGISME DAN ANALOGI AL-GHAZALI DALAM KITAB IHYA' ULUM AL-DIN
AV  - restricted
EP  - 242
ER  -