%0 Thesis
%9 Doctoral
%A Danu Aris Setiyanto, NIM.: 18300016004
%B PASCASARJANA
%D 2024
%F digilib:68260
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K advocacy, interfaith marriage, marital law
%P 319
%T KONSENSUS DALAM ADVOKASI PASANGAN BEDA AGAMA:  Studi Kasus ICRP Jakarta dan Percik Salatiga
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/68260/
%X From law point of view and religious belief, interfaith marriage  (IM) is debatable. Some couples struggle for a recognition before the  law without religion conversion. Indonesian Conference on Religion  and Peace (ICRP) of Jakarta and Persik of Salatiga are two NGOs to  promote a dialogue on religious and interfaith marriage issues  consistantly. For such marriage advocacy seekers the organizations  give them hope. Three research questions to answer in this study are  as follow. 1) Why do ICRP Jakarta and Persik Salatiga carry out  interfaith marriage advocacy?; 2) To what extent does the advocacy  go against the hegemony of interfaith marriage prohibition?; 3) What  consensus is there in the advocacy? ICRP Jakarta and Persik Salatiga  figures, interfaith couples, religion figures, Religion Affairs and  Demographic Affairs Office staffs, textbooks, journals and previous  research of related topic are the sources of data. The three theories  applied in this study are theory of legal pluralism, theory of resistence,  and theory of functional structural.  The study concluds the fllowings. First, the arguments the two  NGOs use in the advocacy are juridical, phylosophical, and  sociological reasons. They argue that there was no express interfaithmarriage  prohibtion in the Indonesian law. They also said that love  was a gift from God, and religious differences should not hinder their  marriage as each of them take it for granted. Interfaith couples  sociologically undergoe a discrimination despite religious leader’s  approval upon their marriage. Second, advocacy is carried out through  consulting, educating, informing, marriage processing and religious  leaders’ faciliting. Experience, human resource, and strong relation are  the firewood of advocacy and resistance against interfaith marriage  prohibition. Advocacy is carried out in two ways: open (legal and  marriage administration path) and close (consultation, education, and  information). Third, interfaith-couple advocacy brings in consensus  on interfaith marriage record. Eminent interfaith-case-concern figures  – ICRP and Persik representatives, religious figures, interfaith couples, and Demographic Office staffs – involve in the discussion to  reach the consensus.
%Z Promotor: Prof. Dr. Sekar Ayu Aryani, M. Ag                   Dr. Sri Wahyuni, S. Ag. M. Ag., M. Hum