%0 Thesis
%9 Masters
%A Muhammad Misbahuddin, NIM.: 17300016045
%B PASCASARJANA
%D 2024
%F digilib:68302
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Health Movement; Knowledge Restructuring; National  Politic; Muslim Community
%P 293
%T RESPONS UMAT ISLAM DALAM GERAKAN  KESEHATAN ERA MANGKUNEGARA VII, 1916-1942 M.
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/68302/
%X The modernity occurring in Mangkunegaran Palace had born  health and sanitation problems which triggered a debate, turmoil, and  conflict within Muslim community leading to the society’s perception  shift of the issue. The dynamic urges Muslim community to rethink of  health and sanitation.  The research applied a political sociology approach. The history  of health and sanitation practiced by Mangkunegaran nobles and the  fellows was examined under the theory of knowledge of Michel  Foucault (w. 1984), theory of mimicry of Homi K. Bhabha (l. 1949),  and theory of society modernity of Muhammad Ali. Traced back to  archive and newspapers, the data were verified, interpreted, and  historiographied to discover historical facts.  The study bore the following results. First, from 1916 to 1942  Swapraja Mangkunegaran thrived to a traditional modern city as the  population increased significantly, new settlements grew irregularly,  and several progressive associations and traditional ones were  established. The phenomenon influenced the society’s life politically,  socially, and religiously. Second, the dynamic brought health and  sanitation to an enigmatic situation for Swapraja Mangkunegaran. The  dwellers’ poor understanding of health and sanitation was commonly  found in the area making knowledge restructure was an urgent issue  to take into account. The situation made Mangkunegara VII come up  with medical workers, known as dokter Swapraja, in his reign. The  division became important. The team worked so persuasively  intruding into every line of life that the action turned into a health and  sanitation movement. Third, the health and sanitation movement  encouraged Muslim community to take part. Selective adaptive and  refute responses also appeared. The former emerged due to the belief  that health and sanitation were not about free from diseases, but they  also represented Muslim identity with which they confirmed their  position in the full-of-symbol society. On the other hand, there was a  refusal against the policy coming from some of the community. They argued that the movement had violated the nobility of Islam and  occasionally disobeyed cultural aspects. The unacceptance impacted  the national politic movements of Muslim community.
%Z Promotor: Prof. Dr. H. Dudung Abdurahman, M.Hum dan Drs. Lathiful  Khuluq, M.A., BSW., Ph.D.