The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
STUDI PERBANDINGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGAWASAN HAKIM DI INDONESIA DAN SINGAPURA DALAM PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADAIYYAH
Siyasah Qadaiyyah is a judicial institution that aims to solve problems with Islamic law. The specific discussion mechanisms in Siyasah Qadaiyyah are: elements of the Judiciary, the status of judges in the government, the requirements to become a judge, the rights and obligations of judges, the relationship between judges and the state, the summoning of judges, the dismissal of judges, evidence capable of being evidence of case examination, judge decisions, and fatwa and Qadha. The Judicial Commission in Indonesia is only authorized regarding alleged violations of the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for Judges (KEPPH) and only has authority over judges, while the supervision of judges in Singapore is through the Singapore Judicial Service which is a collective body of lawyers working in the courts. The author compiles the research methods that will be used as follows, Type of Research that will be used by the author in conducting this research is normative juridical research where the law is conceptualized as what is written in the regulations (law in books), Nature of Research used by the author is descriptive analytical, comparison of supervision of judicial power between Indonesia and Singapore has several similarities and differences, which refer to the position of the institution, the duties and authority of the institution by the two countries, the supervision carried out by the institutions of the two countries, the legal system of the two countries and the focus of the tasks carried out by the institutions in the two countries. Indonesia and Singapore have been able to realize judicial institutions that are in accordance with the principles of siyasah qadhaiyah such as the equality of all people before the law where everyone is entitled to equal treatment before the law, regardless of social status, religion, or race. The right to be heard, where every party involved in a case has the right to be heard and to present their evidence, and fair decisions based on strong evidence. This is certainly a reference that the supervision of judges in both countries has been effective in its implementation. the legal systems of both countries and the focus of the tasks carried out by institutions in both countries.
FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
NIM.: 18103070035 M. Zacky Anwar Makarim
STUDI PERBANDINGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGAWASAN HAKIM DI INDONESIA DAN SINGAPURA DALAM PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADAIYYAH (Text)
STUDI PERBANDINGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGAWASAN HAKIM DI INDONESIA DAN SINGAPURA DALAM PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADAIYYAH (Other)
HTML Summary of #68755 STUDI PERBANDINGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PENGAWASAN HAKIM DI INDONESIA DAN SINGAPURA DALAM PERSPEKTIF SIYASAH QADAIYYAH