The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
HUKUM PEWARNA MAKANAN DAN MINUMAN DARI SERANGGA COCHINEAL (STUDI PERBANDINGAN FATWA MAJELIS ULAMA INDONESIA DAN FATWA JABATAN MUFTI KERAJAAN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM)
Cochineal insect dye (E120) has become one of the ingredients used in the food and beverage industry in various countries. This dye has sparked debates regarding its halal status among fatwa institutions, particularly between the Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) and the Jabatan Mufti Kerajaan Brunei Darussalam. MUI issued Fatwa Number 33 of 2011, stating that dye from cochineal insects can be consumed under certain conditions, while the 2015 fatwa from the Jabatan Mufti Kerajaan Brunei Darussalam declared that the dye is haram for consumption. These differing views attracted the author's attention to conduct a deeper study of the istinbath law methods used by both fatwa institutions. This research aims to analyze the differences in fatwas regarding food and beverage dyes from cochineal insects between the Majelis Ulama Indonesia and the Jabatan Mufti Kerajaan Brunei Darussalam, as well as to understand the legal foundations used by each institution in issuing their fatwas. This type of research is library research. The nature of the research is descriptive-comparative with an ushul fiqh approach. The primary data in this study comes from official fatwas issued by the Majelis Ulama Indonesia and the Jabatan Mufti Kerajaan Brunei Darussalam. Secondary data is obtained from various supporting literatures such as books, journals, and related articles. The theory used in this research is the theory of istinbath law. The results of the study on the Majelis Ulama Indonesia Fatwa Number 33 of 2011 and the 2015 Fatwa from the Jabatan Mufti Kerajaan Brunei Darussalam regarding the legal status of food and beverage dyes from cochineal insects concluded the following. First, the difference in fatwas is due to differing views on the purity and halal status of the insect, as well as differences in the methods of istinbath law used. Second, in determining the legal status of food and beverage dyes from cochineal insects, MUI uses the bayani method, stating that there is no clear prohibition, qiyas by analogizing cochineal with locusts, and the istislahi method, which considers its benefits, thus deeming the dye halal. Meanwhile, the Jabatan Mufti Brunei Darussalam uses a more literal bayani approach and interprets cochineal as khobaits (impurities) while considering health risks, thereby declaring the dye haram. Although the conclusions differ, both fatwas aim to protect the welfare of the community regarding food safety and health.
FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
HUKUM PEWARNA MAKANAN DAN MINUMAN DARI SERANGGA COCHINEAL (STUDI PERBANDINGAN FATWA MAJELIS ULAMA INDONESIA DAN FATWA JABATAN MUFTI KERAJAAN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM) (Text)
HUKUM PEWARNA MAKANAN DAN MINUMAN DARI SERANGGA COCHINEAL (STUDI PERBANDINGAN FATWA MAJELIS ULAMA INDONESIA DAN FATWA JABATAN MUFTI KERAJAAN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM) (Other)
HTML Summary of #68760 HUKUM PEWARNA MAKANAN DAN MINUMAN DARI SERANGGA COCHINEAL (STUDI PERBANDINGAN FATWA MAJELIS ULAMA INDONESIA DAN FATWA JABATAN MUFTI KERAJAAN BRUNEI DARUSSALAM)