The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
PENOLAKAN PEMBATALAN HOMOLOGASI DALAM PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM DAN PEMBIAYAAN SYARIAH (KSPPS) (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 1/PDT.SUS-PEMBATALAN PERDAMAIAN/2023/PN.NIAGA SMG JUNCTO PUTUSAN NOMOR 43/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2020/P
Based on Article 170 paragraph (1) jo. Article 291 paragraph (2) of Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and based on article 7 paragraph (1) and article 8 of the homologation agreement explains that if the debtor is injured in a promise (default), the creditor can apply for the cancellation of homologation so as to cause the debtor to go bankrupt. In the decision, the Panel of Judges considered that the debtor had been proven to have committed a default. However, in its ruling, the Panel of Judges rejected the application for cancellation of the homologation on the grounds that the respondent was a cooperative legal entity. This study examines the legal considerations used by the Panel of Judges in deciding the application for cancellation of homologation in the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) of Sharia Savings and Loan and Financing Cooperatives (KSPPS) as decided number 1/Pdt.Sus-Cancellation of Peace/2023/PN. Niaga Smg juncto decision number 43/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Smg. This type of research is library research with a empiric juridical approach. The theoretical framework used to answer the research question is Gustav Radbruch's theory of basic legal values and theory of Mas}lah}ah Mursalah's. The data sources used in this study are secondary data sources which include primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Data was collected using documentation techniques and analyzed using qualitative data analysis techniques. The results of this study show that the Panel of Judges in their legal considerations did not use legal grounds in the form of the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 1 of 2022 and the Decree of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 109/KMA/SK/IV/2020. Although the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) is not included in the laws and regulations, it is included in the policy regulations (beleidsregel) which are binding into the (internal) Supreme Court and must be complied with by judges in deciding a case that has not yet been fully ruled. Then, the Panel of Judges in its legal considerations has paid attention to the basic legal values of Gustav Radbruch, namely the value of justice, the value of expediency, and the value of legal certainty. Meanwhile, based on the analysis of the mas}lah}ah mursalah, the Panel of Judges has also considered the benefits by rejecting the application for the cancellation of the peace which aims to protect the assets of creditors(hifz} al-ma>l). The issuance of the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 1 of 2022 is one of the efforts to prevent bankruptcy and PKPU of cooperative legal entities that cannot be applied for by cooperative members as creditors.
FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
NIM.: 22203012084 Andrie Nindy Dwiantari, S.H.
PENOLAKAN PEMBATALAN HOMOLOGASI DALAM PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM DAN PEMBIAYAAN SYARIAH (KSPPS) (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 1/PDT.SUS-PEMBATALAN PERDAMAIAN/2023/PN.NIAGA SMG JUNCTO PUTUSAN NOMOR 43/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2020/P (Text)
PENOLAKAN PEMBATALAN HOMOLOGASI DALAM PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM DAN PEMBIAYAAN SYARIAH (KSPPS) (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 1/PDT.SUS-PEMBATALAN PERDAMAIAN/2023/PN.NIAGA SMG JUNCTO PUTUSAN NOMOR 43/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2020/P (Other)
HTML Summary of #68771 PENOLAKAN PEMBATALAN HOMOLOGASI DALAM PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG (PKPU) KOPERASI SIMPAN PINJAM DAN PEMBIAYAAN SYARIAH (KSPPS) (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 1/PDT.SUS-PEMBATALAN PERDAMAIAN/2023/PN.NIAGA SMG JUNCTO PUTUSAN NOMOR 43/PDT.SUS-PKPU/2020/P