eprintid: 69303
rev_number: 10
eprint_status: archive
userid: 12460
dir: disk0/00/06/93/03
datestamp: 2025-01-14 03:14:01
lastmod: 2025-01-14 03:14:01
status_changed: 2025-01-14 03:14:01
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id
creators_name: Vivi Veftiana Sari, NIM.: 21103040179
title: PEMBUKTIAN SEDERHANA DALAM KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG BAGI PENGEMBANG APARTEMEN DAN/ATAU RUMAH SUSUN
ispublished: pub
subjects: 320
divisions: il_hum
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Pembuktian Sederhana, Kepailitan, PKPU, Pengembang (Developer)
note: Dr. Sri Wahyuni, S.Ag., M.Ag., M.Hum
abstract: Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) are
solutions for buyers of apartment units or flats and also financial institutions as
legal remedies if the developer breaks the promise in carrying out the agreed
achievements. The evidence used in bankruptcy and PKPU is with a simple proof
mechanism. However, after the issuance of SEMA Number 3 of 2023 the
developer was declared not to fulfill simple proof. The norms in the policy
regulation contradict the norms in the Bankruptcy and PKPU Law, so the author
is interested in examining simple proof of bankruptcy and PKPU applications
against apartment and flat developers. In this research, the author uses balance
theory and legal certainty theory.
This research uses normative legal research methods. The data collection
technique in this research uses literature study and is supported by interviews
with various parties involved in this research. Furthermore, the data analysis
used in this research is qualitative analysis which is presented descriptively
analytically.
The results of this study indicate that, after the issuance of SEMA Number
3 of 2023, bankruptcy and PKPU applications against apartment and/or flat
developers do not meet simple proof because the debt is still in dispute, so it
cannot be resolved in the Commercial Court. SEMA Number 3 of 2023 is not
based on the principle of balance in bankruptcy and does not provide legal
certainty, because the policy regulation singles out apartment and/or flat
developers who do not meet simple proof without accommodating provisions
related to the classification of debtors who do not meet simple proof. Legal
certainty in canceling bankruptcy and PKPU applications against apartment
and/or flat developers after the issuance of SEMA Number 3 of 2023 is through a
civil lawsuit to the District Court.
date: 2024-12-12
date_type: published
pages: 168
institution: UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
department: FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM
thesis_type: skripsi
thesis_name: other
citation:   Vivi Veftiana Sari, NIM.: 21103040179  (2024) PEMBUKTIAN SEDERHANA DALAM KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG BAGI PENGEMBANG APARTEMEN DAN/ATAU RUMAH SUSUN.  Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/69303/1/21103040179_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/69303/2/21103040179_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf