relation: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/69327/
title: PEMAKNAAN KEADAAN MENDESAK SEBAGAI ALASAN DALAM PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN (STUDI PENETAPAN PENGADILAN AGAMA PADANG TAHUN 2020-2023)
creator: Muhammad Irfan AD, NIM.: 22203012040
subject: 346.01 Hukum Keluarga - Hukum Pernikahan
description: The Article 7 paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 of 2019 Concerning the  Amendment to Law Number 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage and Supreme Court  Regulation (PERMA) Number 5 of 2019 Concerning Guidelines for Adjudicating  Marriage Dispensation Applications, stipulates that marriage dispensation can only  be granted in urgent circumstances. However, these provisions do not specify the  parameters that define urgency, giving rise to a variety of interpretations among  judges. These various interpretations can lead to disparities in decisions that impact  on consistency and fairness in the application of the law. Therefore, this study aims to  map the diversity of judges' interpretations of urgent circumstances in the  determination of marriage dispensation, and analyze the factors that influence these  differences in interpretation, as well as evaluate the extent to which the value of  maslahah is applied in the legal decision-making process.  The type of research conducted by the author is field research with an  analytical descriptive nature that uses an empirical juridical research approach.  Judges at the Padang Religious Court, who were interviewed directly through  research, Neil MacCormick's Legal Reasoning Theory, Jasser Auda's Maqāṣid  Syarī'ah Theory, and the Padang Religious Court Stipulation as primary sources and  secondary sources in the form of journals, books, theses or legal articles related to the  problem. Then analysed using qualitative analysis techniques and using Legal  Reasoning Theory and Maqāṣid Sharī'ah Theory to analyse the determination of  marriage dispensation.  The results showed that, First, the interpretation of the phrase urgent  circumstances in Article 7 paragraph (2) of Law Number 16 of 2019 Amendment to  Law Number 1 of 1974 Concerning Marriage shows the important role of judges in  prioritising justice. Based on Neil MacCormick's legal reasoning theory, judges do not  only refer to formal texts, but also consider religious values, social norms, and factual  needs. Secondly, the judge decided the case using the maqāṣid syarī'ah approach,  which emphasises the objectives of Islamic law, namely maintaining the benefit and  preventing harm, and integrating the six characteristics of Islamic legal epistemology:  cognitive nature, wholeness, openness, hierarchical harmony, multidimensionality,  and meaningfulness.
date: 2024-12-11
type: Thesis
type: NonPeerReviewed
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/69327/1/22203012040_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
format: text
language: id
identifier: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/69327/2/22203012040_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf
identifier:   Muhammad Irfan AD, NIM.: 22203012040  (2024) PEMAKNAAN KEADAAN MENDESAK SEBAGAI ALASAN DALAM PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN (STUDI PENETAPAN PENGADILAN AGAMA PADANG TAHUN 2020-2023).  Masters thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.