@phdthesis{digilib70090,
           month = {January},
           title = {TELAAH TEORI METAFISIKA IMANEN GILLES DELEUZE TERHADAP FENOMENA DISKRIMINASI AGAMA DI INDONESIA},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM.: 20105010001 Angelia Ramadhani Saragih},
            year = {2025},
            note = {Dr. Novian Widiadharma, S.Fil., M.Hum},
        keywords = {Metafisika Imanen, Diskriminasi Agama, Afirmasi, Logika Representatif, Keserbaragaman},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/70090/},
        abstract = {This research explores the prevalent issue of religious discrimination in
Indonesia and addresses the lack of studies examining this topic through frameworks
other than axiological and transcendent metaphysical perspectives, which are mainly
structural and substantial. Accordingly, it offers a novel interpretation of the issue by
first investigating the genealogy and topology of the phenomenon of religious
discrimination in Indonesia and subsequently analyzing and interpreting the findings
through the lens of Gilles Deleuze's metaphysical theory of immanence, as he was
one of the key figures in French post-structuralism.
Hence, this study aims to answer the research question, namely: what insights
can be gleaned when examining religious discrimination against minority and
heterodox beliefs in Indonesia through the lens of metaphysics of immanence
developed by Gilles Deleuze; by using descriptive-interpretive approach.
The study concludes that the practice of religious discrimination and violence
in Indonesia is a reactive phenomenon. It?s a product of a structural-representational
worldview that has long been forged by history and could endanger the sustainability
of Indonesia's plane of immanence if not addressed promptly. The alternative solution
offered is for society and the state to fully embrace (affirm) the active, creative,
singular, and heterodox character of the immanent and becoming reality by reevaluating
said dominant worldview (the old image of thought); particularly if
diversity (i.e., difference and multiplicity) is deemed important and vital to the nation.}
}