The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
PROBLEMATIKA KEWENANGAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MENGADILI KEPUTUSAN PARIPURNA DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH (STUDI KASUS GUGATAN FADEL MUHAMMAD KE PTUN JAKARTA)
The 13th plenary session of the Regional Representative Council (DPD) of the Republic of Indonesia in 2022 decided to dismiss Fadel Muhammad from his position as Deputy Speaker of the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) representing the DPD through Decree Number 2/DPDRI/I/2022-2023. This decision was based on a motion of no confidence signed by the majority of DPD members. Feeling aggrieved, Fadel Muhammad filed a lawsuit with the Jakarta Administrative Court (PTUN). The lawsuit sparked debates regarding PTUN's jurisdiction over decisions arising from political processes in plenary sessions. Some legal experts argued that the decision was political and outside PTUN's jurisdiction, while others believed PTUN could adjudicate it as long as it met the criteria for an Administrative Decision (KTUN). This study aims to examine PTUN's jurisdiction over the DPD Decree through two main focuses: (1) analyzing whether the decision fulfills the elements of a KTUN as defined by Law No. 5 of 1986 on Administrative Court Procedures and Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration, and (2) assessing PTUN's jurisdiction from the perspective of maslahah mursalah, an Islamic legal method that evaluates the broader benefits of legal applications. This research employs a normative juridical method with a case and statutory approach. The findings indicate that the DPD Decree meets the KTUN criteria, including being concrete, individual, and final. However, the decision was a political product resulting from a plenary session, which is legally better classified as a state governance action. Based on the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court, PTUN lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate decisions stemming from political processes such as plenary sessions. From the perspective of maslahah mursalah, Fadel Muhammad's right to the position involves the protection of justice (life) and income (property), classified as maslahat adh-dharuriyyat, or fundamental benefits. Nevertheless, the DPD Decree, reflecting the collective political will of DPD members, is considered to serve a greater benefit as it addresses broader societal interests compared to the individual benefit of Fadel Muhammad.
FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
NIM.: 21103070046 Atho’illah Azizul Haqqy
PROBLEMATIKA KEWENANGAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MENGADILI KEPUTUSAN PARIPURNA DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH (STUDI KASUS GUGATAN FADEL MUHAMMAD KE PTUN JAKARTA) (Text)
PROBLEMATIKA KEWENANGAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MENGADILI KEPUTUSAN PARIPURNA DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH (STUDI KASUS GUGATAN FADEL MUHAMMAD KE PTUN JAKARTA) (Other)
HTML Summary of #70321 PROBLEMATIKA KEWENANGAN PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MENGADILI KEPUTUSAN PARIPURNA DEWAN PERWAKILAN DAERAH (STUDI KASUS GUGATAN FADEL MUHAMMAD KE PTUN JAKARTA)