%0 Thesis
%9 Skripsi
%A Refi Aprilia Andika Putri, NIM.: 21103040159
%B FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM
%D 2025
%F digilib:70479
%I UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
%K Penyelesaian Sengketa, Perjanjian Jual Beli Tanah, Wanprestasi
%P 135
%T EFEKTIVITAS MEDIASI SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KASUS JUAL BELI TANAH DI BADAN PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KONSUMEN KOTA YOGYAKARTA
%U https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/70479/
%X In accordance with what is explained in Article 1457 of the Civil Code, carrying out a sale and purchase requires an agreement that includes the rights and obligations attached to the seller and buyer. In this case, the seller's obligation is to be able to provide a guarantee for the goods in accordance with the agreement and the buyer's obligation is to be able to claim compensation if the goods received do not comply with the agreement. However, related to this, there was a case regarding land sale and purchase default at the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) where the consumer/buyer felt that the land they purchased in 2023 did not match the information stated on the certificate. The size of the land is less than the description, even the land is cut off for the river border. Due to this, the buyer canceled the sale and purchase of the land, but the seller was not willing to return the down payment that had been paid by the buyer because the previous agreement stated that if the purchase was canceled the down payment would be forfeited. Therefore, the case was resolved through a mediation process at BPSK. However, in reality this case cannot be resolved through the mediation process.  This research is a type of empirical research carried out systematically to collect data in the field. The research approach used is a juridical-empiical approach using applicable laws and regulations and is empirically carried out through observations and interviews with the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency (BPSK) Yogyakarta City.  The results of the research show that, firstly, the result of mediation in land sale and purchase disputes at BPSK Yogyakarta City was that the buyer asked the seller to be responsible for the losses they experienced, but there was a discrepancy in the seller's responsibility to the buyer with Article 19 paragraph 1 of the Consumer Protection Law because the seller did not want to pay in full according to the down payment that had been paid in full by the buyer. Second, mediation at BPSK Yogyakarta City as an alternative resolution of land sale and purchase disputes was not effective due to the lack of good faith on the part of the disputing parties, where the parties did not provide a balanced solution during the mediation process and adhered to their respective wishes so that the implementation of the mediation did not reach a point of consensus
%Z Dr. Wardatul Fitri, M.H.