TY  - THES
N1  - Salwa Faeha Hanim, S.H., M.H.
ID  - digilib70770
UR  - https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/70770/
A1  - Ananda Raditya, NIM.: 21103040215
Y1  - 2025/02/25/
N2  - The Video Reaction phenomenon is an activity that is currently very popular among YouTube viewers carried out by a YouTube content creator by recording himself in the form of a video of the creator's facial expressions and emotions while watching a video show and then uploaded back to his YouTube account. However, the creation of Reaction Videos that do not consider the licensing aspect will violate the economic rights and moral rights of the creator as long as it is for commercial purposes/to benefit from the content, the same for the creator will feel disadvantaged and violate the concept of the principle of good faith related to the determination of the actions taken is feasibl /otherwise, in fact the content creator who wants to create Reaction Video content must carry out licensing such as licensing contracts containing royalties paid to the creator according to the contents of the specified contract, In this context, the problem formulation that arises is first how the limitations of making Reaction Video content on YouTube can be said to violate Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright Regarding Copyright and secondly how legal protection efforts for creators according to Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright Regarding Copyright in Making Reaction Video Content on YouTube.
In the preparation of this thesis using the type of normative legal research focused on written studies, such as using secondary data; legislation, court decisions, legal theories and scientific works of scholars. The type of research in this study used is a type of library research and uses several approaches, namely; first a conceptual approach and second a statutory approach and uses qualitative data analysis.
The result of this research is that starting from the creation of a reaction video, if the creator feels harmed and submits a copyright claim through the Content ID system feature, which automatically Content ID cannot decide whether the reaction video content is a reasonable interest / otherwise, it will have an impact that the reaction video will not be monetized, get a strike, until the video is removed (take down), because even though the reaction video meets the elements of a reasonable interest in YouTube policy and Article 44 Paragraph 1 of Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright in the form of for educational purposes, security, lectures, performances and does not harm the reasonable interests of the creator, If the creator is harmed, the reaction video will still be subject to copyright claims, so in this case between Law Number 28 of 2014 Concerning Copyright and YouTube policy is not in line in determining the reasonable interests of the reaction video content, besides that if the situation is detrimental to the economic rights of the creator, then Law Number 28 of 2014 Concerning Copyright and YouTube Policy itself has provided preventive measures in the form of licensing options such as compulsory licenses, all rights reserved, and creative commons that can be used by the creator in order to provide legal protection for the creator and provide benefits to the creator in the form of royalties from the license between the creator as a licensor and the reaction video creator as a licensee
PB  - UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
KW  - Hak Cipta
KW  -  Sengketa Hak Cipta
KW  -  Lisensi Hak Cipta
KW  -  Konten Youtube
M1  - skripsi
TI  - TINJAUAN YURIDIS TENTANG PELANGGARAN HAK CIPTA (PEMBUATAN KONTEN VIDEO REACTION DI YOUTUBE BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 28 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG HAK CIPTA)
AV  - restricted
EP  - 122
ER  -