eprintid: 71951
rev_number: 11
eprint_status: archive
userid: 12460
dir: disk0/00/07/19/51
datestamp: 2025-07-17 08:39:01
lastmod: 2025-07-17 08:39:01
status_changed: 2025-07-17 08:39:01
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id
creators_name: Davina Malvaputri Mayadita Subronto, NIM.: 21103070041
title: PENAFSIRAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY) TENTANG PERPANJANGAN MASA JABATAN PIMPINAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI
ispublished: pub
subjects: 342
divisions: tata_negara
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: Mahkamah Konstitusi, Open Legal Policy, Masa Jabatan, KPK,
Judicial Review, Siyasah Tasyri’iyyah
note: Dr. Ahmad Yani Anshori, M.Ag
abstract: The Constitutional Court Decision Number 112/PUU-XX/2022, which
extended the term of office of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK)
leadership from four to five years, has sparked significant public and academic
debate. The issue arises from concerns over the misuse of the open legal policy
doctrine, which allows the Constitutional Court to intrude into the legislative
domain. This research is guided by two main questions: How does the
Constitutional Court interpret open legal policy in Decision Number 112/PUUXX/
2022 and How is this interpretation viewed from the perspective of fiqh
siyasah tasyri’iyyah.
This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory and case
approach. Data were collected through library research of laws, books, journals,
and relevant legal documents. The research is descriptive-analytical and focuses
on normative analysis of the Constitutional Court’s decision and its relevance to
Islamic legal principles from the siyasah tasyri’iyyah perspective.
The findings show that the Constitutional Court has expanded the
interpretation of open legal policy beyond its legitimate authority as a negative
legislator. This blurs the line between legislative and judicial functions and
creates a potential conflict of interest, especially since the decision benefits the
current KPK leadership. A literature review of various journals and dissertations
supports these concerns, highlighting similar critiques in previous rulings.
Therefore, stricter limitations and constitutional parameters are needed to
prevent the misuse of open legal policy in judicial reviews, ensuring compliance
with the rule of law and democratic governance.
date: 2025-05-27
date_type: published
pages: 89
institution: UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
department: FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM
thesis_type: skripsi
thesis_name: other
citation:   Davina Malvaputri Mayadita Subronto, NIM.: 21103070041  (2025) PENAFSIRAN KEBIJAKAN HUKUM TERBUKA (OPEN LEGAL POLICY) TENTANG PERPANJANGAN MASA JABATAN PIMPINAN KOMISI PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI.  Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/71951/1/21103070041_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/71951/2/21103070041_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf