@phdthesis{digilib71976, month = {June}, title = {ASPEK KEADILAN TERHADAP PEMBAYARAN UPAH BARISTA DI COFFEE SHOP SJ BANTUL}, school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA}, author = {NIM.: 21103080073 Andri Firmansyah}, year = {2025}, note = {Ratnasari Fajariya Abidin,S.H.,M.H.}, keywords = {Hukum Islam, Pengupahan, Barista, Akad Ijarah, Keadilan, Ketenagakerjaan}, url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/71976/}, abstract = {This research discusses the Islamic legal perspective on the wage system for baristas at Coffee Shop SJ in Bantul, which is deemed inconsistent with the principles of ijarah contracts in Islam and labor regulations in Indonesia. The study aims to analyze the practice of ijarah in wage payments at SJ, assess the aspect of justice in its wage system according to Islamic law, and review its compliance with applicable labor regulations. The research method employed is field research with a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected through interviews with workers and business owners, direct observations at the location, and literature studies related to Islamic law and labor regulations. Data analysis was conducted deductively by linking the theory of ijarah contracts, justice in Islam, and labor regulations with the practices observed in the field. The research findings indicate that the wage system at Coffee Shop SJ still faces several issues. From the perspective of the ijarah contract, verbal employment agreements are considered valid in Islamic law, and the owner of the caf{\'e} has made efforts to discuss matters related to wages and workload. However, the absence of a written contract can lead to unclear definitions of employee rights and responsibilities. Additionally, repeated delays in wage payments without clear justification contradict the principles of ijarah in Islam. From a justice perspective, the wages provided are below the Bantul Regency Minimum Wage (UMK), which is inconsistent with the Islamic principle of justice and the theory of distributive justice that emphasizes a balance between workers? rights and their contributions. Legally, this practice also violates Law No. 6 of 2023 and Government Regulation No. 51 of 2023 on Wages, which require employers to pay wages according to the government-mandated minimum standard and impose fines for delayed payments. From the employer's point of view, the wage system is considered acceptable because it has been discussed with employees; however, from the employees' perspective, there is inequality, as they do not have the power to express their concerns about wages, which creates fear and a sense of injustice.} }