The repository administrator has not yet configured an RDF license.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS NORMATIF TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN (STUDI TERHADAP PENETAPAN PENGADILAN AGAMA BOYOLALI NOMOR 35/PDT.P/2024/PA.BI DAN NOMOR 50/PDT.P/2024/PA.BI)
Marriage dispensation is permission from the court for a prospective bride and groom who have not reached the minimum age for legal marriage. It is usually applied for by parents or guardians because of concerns about violating social and religious norms, or because of pregnancy outside marriage. The judge has the discretion to grant or deny the application based on the facts and legal considerations at trial. This research highlights the differences in considerations in two stipulations by the same judge at PA Boyolali. In Stipulation No. 35/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bi, the application was granted due to the close relationship of the prospective bride and groom and the economic readiness of the prospective husband. In contrast, in Stipulation No. 50/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bi, the application was rejected even though the wife-to-be was five months pregnant, because she was considered psychologically unprepared and underage. The difference in the judge's consideration of the two stipulations became the focus of the research. This thesis uses a library research method with a normative legal approach and is descriptive and analytical in nature. Data collection techniques were carried out through documentation, namely a study of court decision documents. The data used is secondary data, including primary legal materials (Collection of Islamic Law, Marriage Law, and Decision No. 35/Pdt.P/2024/PA. Bi and 50/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bi), secondary legal materials (such as books, journals, scientific articles, and expert opinions), and tertiary legal materials (legal dictionaries and encyclopedias). The research findings indicate that Decisions No. 35/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bi and No. 50/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bi both reflect procedural justice as they were rendered through valid legal mechanisms. However, through John Rawls' Theory of Justice, Decision No. 50 better reflects substantive justice because it rejects marriage dispensation for a 13-year-old girl in order to protect her rights to education, health, and development. Conversely, Decision No. 35, although procedurally valid, still leaves room for substantive injustice due to potential social pressure and economic vulnerability. Both decisions highlight the importance of protecting vulnerable groups, although the Rawlsian principle applied remains remedial and has not addressed the structural roots of the issue of child marriage comprehensively. Meanwhile, from the perspective of Sudikno Mertokusumo's legal discovery theory, the judges applied different interpretation methods in the two rulings, namely sociological interpretation in Ruling No. 35/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bi and teleological interpretation in Ruling No. 50/Pdt.P/2024/PA.Bi.
FAKULTAS SYARI’AH DAN HUKUM, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
NIM.: 22203012018 Wildan Zulfikar Rasyid
TINJAUAN YURIDIS NORMATIF TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN (STUDI TERHADAP PENETAPAN PENGADILAN AGAMA BOYOLALI NOMOR 35/PDT.P/2024/PA.BI DAN NOMOR 50/PDT.P/2024/PA.BI) (Text)
TINJAUAN YURIDIS NORMATIF TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN (STUDI TERHADAP PENETAPAN PENGADILAN AGAMA BOYOLALI NOMOR 35/PDT.P/2024/PA.BI DAN NOMOR 50/PDT.P/2024/PA.BI) (Other)
HTML Summary of #72220 TINJAUAN YURIDIS NORMATIF TERHADAP PERTIMBANGAN HUKUM HAKIM DALAM MENETAPKAN PERMOHONAN DISPENSASI KAWIN (STUDI TERHADAP PENETAPAN PENGADILAN AGAMA BOYOLALI NOMOR 35/PDT.P/2024/PA.BI DAN NOMOR 50/PDT.P/2024/PA.BI)
297.577 Hukum Keluarga Islam, Bimbingan Pernikahan, Poligami, Perceraian, Iddah, Pengasuhan Anak)