@mastersthesis{digilib72223,
           month = {June},
           title = {SERUAN BOIKOT TERHADAP PRODUK YANG TERAFILIASI DENGAN ISRAEL (ANALISIS FATWA MUI NO. 83 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG HUKUM DUKUNGAN TERHADAP PERJUANGAN PALESTINA)},
          school = {UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA},
          author = {NIM.: 23203011144 Kiki Nurul Komaria, S.H.},
            year = {2025},
            note = {Dr. Ahmad Patiroy, M.Ag.},
        keywords = {Fatwa MUI, Boikot Produk Israel, Maqa{\d s}id al-Syar'ah,
Jasser Auda},
             url = {https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/72223/},
        abstract = {The Indonesian Council of Ulama (Majelis Ulama
Indonesia/MUI) issued Fatwa No. 83 of 2023 on the Legal Status of
Support for the Palestinian Struggle, which calls for the boycott of
products affiliated with Israel as a form of solidarity with the
oppressed Palestinian people. This fatwa was issued in response to
Israel?s ongoing aggression that has triggered humanitarian crises
and violated principles of justice and human rights. This study aims to
examine the legal considerations underlying the fatwa and analyze to
what extent its substance aligns with the objectives of Islamic law
(maq{\=a}{\d s}id al-shar{\=i}?ah) from the perspective of Jasser Auda.
This research is a library study using a normative Islamic legal
approach and a philosophical framework. The method used is
descriptive-analytical, with primary data derived from Fatwa No. 83
of 2023 and secondary sources from supporting literature. The
theoretical framework is based on Jasser Auda?s concept of maq{\=a}{\d s}id
al-shar{\=i}?ah, which views Islamic legal objectives through a holistic
and dynamic system. This approach is used to assess the relevance of
the fatwa?s boycott provision in relation to principles of justice, public
welfare, and ethical consumer behavior.
The findings show that Fatwa No. 83 of 2023 is consistent with
the principles of maq{\=a}{\d s}id al-shar{\=i}?ah, particularly in preserving
religion ({\d h}if{\d z} al-d{\=i}n), life ({\d h}if{\d z} al-nafs), wealth ({\d h}if{\d z} al-m{\=a}l), and the
dignity of the Muslim community. The fatwa prohibits all forms of
support, both direct and indirect for Israel, including economic
transactions, while encouraging alternative forms of support that
comply with Islamic principles. From Jasser Auda?s perspective, the
fatwa reflects a dynamic, responsive, and contextual approach to
Islamic law, fulfilling public interests across the levels of {\d d}ar{\=u}riyy{\=a}t
(essentials), {\d h}{\=a}jiyy{\=a}t (complementary needs), and ta{\d h}s{\=i}niyy{\=a}t
(enhancements). The fatwa serves not only as a religious response but
also as an ethical and strategic call for social justice and global
solidarity.}
}