eprintid: 72902
rev_number: 10
eprint_status: archive
userid: 12460
dir: disk0/00/07/29/02
datestamp: 2025-09-15 07:36:04
lastmod: 2025-09-15 07:36:04
status_changed: 2025-09-15 07:36:04
type: thesis
metadata_visibility: show
contact_email: muh.khabib@uin-suka.ac.id
creators_name: Ilham Ghozali, NIM.: 18106060012
title: ANALISIS PEMASOK BAHAN BAKU FURNITUR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE AHP DAN SAW  (STUDI KASUS: CV. MKB, BANTUL)
ispublished: pub
subjects: 670
divisions: jur_tind
full_text_status: restricted
keywords: AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process), HPL (High Pressure Laminated), Pemilihan Pemasok, Pengambilan Keputusan Multikriteria (Multi-Criteria Decision Making/MCDM), SAW (Simple Additive Weighting)
note: Ir. Khusna Dwijayanti, ST., M.Eng., Ph.D., ASEAN Eng.
abstract: The selection of appropriate raw material suppliers is a crucial factor in supporting operational efficiency and ensuring the quality of final products, particularly in the furniture industry. CV. MKB, a company engaged in furniture manufacturing, utilizes HPL (High Pressure Laminated) as its primary raw material in the production process. The current process of selecting HPL suppliers at CV. MKB remains manual and unstructured, making it vulnerable to subjectivity, time-consuming procedures, and inefficiencies. Variations in price, quality, delivery time, and warranty among suppliers pose significant challenges in decision-making. This study aims to analyze and determine the best HPL supplier by applying the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) to determine the weight of each criterion, and the SAW (Simple Additive Weighting) method for evaluating and ranking the alternatives. A quantitative approach was employed, using primary data obtained from three expert respondents. Four main criteria were used in the supplier evaluation: delivery time, quality, warranty, and price. The results of the AHP calculation indicate that quality has the highest weight of 0.43, followed by price at 0.30, delivery time at 0.19, and warranty at 0.08. These weights were then applied in the SAW method to rank the three analyzed suppliers. Based on the SAW analysis, TB. Kasongan was identified as the best supplier with the highest preference score of 1.00, followed by CV. Cipta Sejahtera Bersama with 0.98, and PT. Mitra Anda with 0.81. The combination of AHP and SAW provides a systematic and objective approach to supporting MCDM (Multi Criteria Decision Making) in the manufacturing industry.
date: 2025-08-13
date_type: published
pages: 120
institution: UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA
department: FAKULTAS SAINS DAN TEKNOLOGI
thesis_type: skripsi
thesis_name: other
citation:   Ilham Ghozali, NIM.: 18106060012  (2025) ANALISIS PEMASOK BAHAN BAKU FURNITUR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE AHP DAN SAW (STUDI KASUS: CV. MKB, BANTUL).  Skripsi thesis, UIN SUNAN KALIJAGA YOGYAKARTA.   
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/72902/1/18106060012_BAB-I_IV-atau-V_DAFTAR-PUSTAKA.pdf
document_url: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/72902/2/18106060012_BAB-II_sampai_SEBELUM-BAB-TERAKHIR.pdf